Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Human Rights: Reform
Criticisms of the Human Rights Act
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
Sovereignty criticism of the Human Rights Act, democratic legitimacy criticism and criticism concerning Strasbourg.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What is the sovereignty criticism of the Human Rights Act?
What is the democratic legitimacy criticism?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is the sovereignty criticism of the Human Rights Act?
Model answer
Critics argue that the interpretive duty allows judges to rewrite statutes Parliament has enacted. Reading words into a provision is said to substitute the court's meaning for the one Parliament chose.
- 2
What is the democratic legitimacy criticism?
Model answer
Critics argue that unelected judges decide contested questions of social policy under the guise of interpretation. Supporters reply that Parliament instructed the courts to do so and can legislate again at any time.
- 3
What is the criticism concerning Strasbourg?
Model answer
Critics argue that section 2 has in practice tied domestic courts to a foreign court's case law. The mirror principle is said to have made domestic judges followers rather than developers of rights.
- 4
What is the criticism about rights for the undeserving?
Model answer
Critics point to cases where prisoners, foreign offenders or those facing deportation have relied on Convention rights successfully. Supporters reply that a right available only to the popular is not a right at all.
- 5
What is the criticism about the balance between rights and responsibilities?
Model answer
Critics argue that the Act sets out entitlements without corresponding duties. Supporters reply that limits are already built into the qualified rights. The Convention protects individuals against the state rather than regulating citizens.
- 6
What is the criticism concerning Article 8 in immigration cases?
Model answer
Critics argue that the right to family life has been used to resist deportation in cases the public finds indefensible. Parliament responded by legislating on how the public interest should be weighed in such cases.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Human Rights: Reform, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.