Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort Law
Reform of the tort system and no-fault alternatives
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
No-fault compensation scheme, argument for extending strict liability more widely and argument against extending strict liability more widely.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Which country replaced most personal injury claims with a no-fault scheme, and when?
What did the Pearson Commission recommend in 1978?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is a no-fault compensation scheme?
Model answer
A no-fault scheme pays an injured person out of a public or industry fund without proof of fault. The injured person normally gives up the right to sue in tort in return.
- 2
Which country replaced most personal injury claims with a no-fault scheme, and when?
Model answer
New Zealand replaced most personal injury actions with a state accident compensation scheme in 1974. An injured person there claims from the scheme instead of suing.
- 3
What did the Pearson Commission recommend in 1978?
Model answer
The Pearson Commission recommended a no-fault scheme for injuries caused by motor vehicles, funded by a levy on petrol. The Commission's main recommendations were never implemented.
- 4
Give two arguments for replacing tort with a no-fault scheme.
Model answer
A no-fault scheme compensates every injured person quickly and at low administrative cost. Nobody is left with nothing merely because no wrongdoer can be identified.
- 5
Give two arguments against replacing tort with a no-fault scheme.
Model answer
A no-fault scheme is a heavy charge on the taxpayer and pays far less than a court award. Removing the threat of being sued may also weaken the incentive to take care.
- 6
What does the NHS Redress Act 2006 provide for?
Model answer
The NHS Redress Act 2006 created a framework for settling lower-value clinical negligence claims without litigation. A scheme under the Act offers an investigation, an explanation, an apology and a limited payment.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort Law, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.