levo

Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort Law

Reform of the tort system and no-fault alternatives

  • 3 things to know
  • Components 2 and 3

Overview

No-fault compensation scheme, argument for extending strict liability more widely and argument against extending strict liability more widely.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

What is a no-fault compensation scheme?

Numbers

Which country replaced most personal injury claims with a no-fault scheme, and when?

Key term

What did the Pearson Commission recommend in 1978?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What is a no-fault compensation scheme?

    Model answer

    A no-fault scheme pays an injured person out of a public or industry fund without proof of fault. The injured person normally gives up the right to sue in tort in return.

  2. 2

    Which country replaced most personal injury claims with a no-fault scheme, and when?

    Model answer

    New Zealand replaced most personal injury actions with a state accident compensation scheme in 1974. An injured person there claims from the scheme instead of suing.

  3. 3

    What did the Pearson Commission recommend in 1978?

    Model answer

    The Pearson Commission recommended a no-fault scheme for injuries caused by motor vehicles, funded by a levy on petrol. The Commission's main recommendations were never implemented.

  4. 4

    Give two arguments for replacing tort with a no-fault scheme.

    Model answer

    A no-fault scheme compensates every injured person quickly and at low administrative cost. Nobody is left with nothing merely because no wrongdoer can be identified.

  5. 5

    Give two arguments against replacing tort with a no-fault scheme.

    Model answer

    A no-fault scheme is a heavy charge on the taxpayer and pays far less than a court award. Removing the threat of being sued may also weaken the incentive to take care.

  6. 6

    What does the NHS Redress Act 2006 provide for?

    Model answer

    The NHS Redress Act 2006 created a framework for settling lower-value clinical negligence claims without litigation. A scheme under the Act offers an investigation, an explanation, an apology and a limited payment.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The court sits in .
StrasbourgLondonParis

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AAn interim injunction restrains publication before trial.
BPublication cannot be undone.
CAn injunction may be the only effective remedy.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A Public Bill changes the general law.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort Law, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.