levo

Criminal Law: Capacity Defences

Intoxication by drugs and involuntary intoxication

  • 3 things to know
  • Components 2 and 3

Overview

How the law splits dangerous drugs from soporific and sedative ones, Lipman and Hardie either side of that line, and why involuntary intoxication still fails if the defendant formed the mens rea anyway.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

How does the law classify drugs for the purposes of intoxication?

Numbers

Which case shows a defendant convicted of manslaughter after taking a hallucinogenic drug?

Numbers

How are soporific or sedative drugs treated?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    How does the law classify drugs for the purposes of intoxication?

    Model answer

    The law distinguishes dangerous drugs from drugs not known to cause unpredictable behaviour. Taking a dangerous drug is treated as voluntary intoxication.

  2. 2

    Which case shows a defendant convicted of manslaughter after taking a hallucinogenic drug?

    Model answer

    R v Lipman [1970] upheld a manslaughter conviction where the defendant killed a woman during an LSD hallucination. The intoxication defeated the specific intent for murder but not the basic intent for manslaughter.

  3. 3

    How are soporific or sedative drugs treated?

    Model answer

    R v Hardie [1985] held that a drug with a merely sedative or soporific effect is not treated as dangerous. A defendant who takes such a drug is not automatically reckless.

  4. 4

    What is involuntary intoxication?

    Model answer

    Involuntary intoxication arises where the defendant did not know of the intoxicating substance. A spiked drink and an unexpected reaction to prescribed medication are examples.

  5. 5

    Is involuntary intoxication a defence to a basic intent offence?

    Model answer

    Involuntary intoxication may be relied on for a basic intent offence. The defendant has not chosen to run any risk.

  6. 6

    What must a defendant show to succeed on involuntary intoxication?

    Model answer

    The defendant must show that the mens rea was absent altogether. R v Kingston [1994] confirmed that a defendant who formed the intent remains guilty.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The court sits in .
StrasbourgLondonParis

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AAn interim injunction restrains publication before trial.
BPublication cannot be undone.
CAn injunction may be the only effective remedy.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A Public Bill changes the general law.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Criminal Law: Capacity Defences, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.