Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Criminal Law: Capacity Defences
Intoxication by drugs and involuntary intoxication
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
How the law splits dangerous drugs from soporific and sedative ones, Lipman and Hardie either side of that line, and why involuntary intoxication still fails if the defendant formed the mens rea anyway.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Which case shows a defendant convicted of manslaughter after taking a hallucinogenic drug?
How are soporific or sedative drugs treated?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
How does the law classify drugs for the purposes of intoxication?
Model answer
The law distinguishes dangerous drugs from drugs not known to cause unpredictable behaviour. Taking a dangerous drug is treated as voluntary intoxication.
- 2
Which case shows a defendant convicted of manslaughter after taking a hallucinogenic drug?
Model answer
R v Lipman [1970] upheld a manslaughter conviction where the defendant killed a woman during an LSD hallucination. The intoxication defeated the specific intent for murder but not the basic intent for manslaughter.
- 3
How are soporific or sedative drugs treated?
Model answer
R v Hardie [1985] held that a drug with a merely sedative or soporific effect is not treated as dangerous. A defendant who takes such a drug is not automatically reckless.
- 4
What is involuntary intoxication?
Model answer
Involuntary intoxication arises where the defendant did not know of the intoxicating substance. A spiked drink and an unexpected reaction to prescribed medication are examples.
- 5
Is involuntary intoxication a defence to a basic intent offence?
Model answer
Involuntary intoxication may be relied on for a basic intent offence. The defendant has not chosen to run any risk.
- 6
What must a defendant show to succeed on involuntary intoxication?
Model answer
The defendant must show that the mens rea was absent altogether. R v Kingston [1994] confirmed that a defendant who formed the intent remains guilty.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Criminal Law: Capacity Defences, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.