Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Tort: Defences and Remedies
Defences and remedies in claims connected to nuisance and Rylands v Fletcher
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
Which general defences run against these claims and which do not, why contributory negligence is so rarely argued, and when a court will price the harm in damages rather than order an injunction.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Which general defences may be raised against a claim connected to nuisance?
How does volenti apply to a claim connected to nuisance?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Which general defences may be raised against a claim connected to nuisance?
Model answer
Volenti non fit injuria and contributory negligence are both available against a nuisance claim. Illegality may also bar a claimant whose loss flows from their own criminal conduct.
- 2
How does volenti apply to a claim connected to nuisance?
Model answer
A claimant who freely agreed to the interference cannot afterwards complain of it. The agreement must be genuine and must extend to the interference actually suffered.
- 3
Can contributory negligence reduce damages in a claim under Rylands v Fletcher?
Model answer
Damages may be reduced where the claimant's own carelessness contributed to the loss. The Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 applies in the ordinary way.
- 4
Why is contributory negligence rarely argued in a nuisance claim?
Model answer
A claimant in nuisance is usually doing no more than occupying land in the ordinary way. Fault by such a claimant is unusual, though it can arise where a clear warning was ignored.
- 5
When will a court award damages instead of an injunction?
Model answer
Shelfer v City of London Electric Lighting Co [1895] allowed damages in lieu where the injury to legal rights is small. The injury must also be capable of being estimated in money and adequately met by a small payment. Granting an injunction must additionally be oppressive to the defendant.
- 6
How did Coventry v Lawrence [2014] change the approach to damages in lieu of an injunction?
Model answer
The Supreme Court held in 2014 that the Shelfer conditions are guidance rather than a straitjacket. A court now has a broader discretion to award damages in place of an injunction.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Tort: Defences and Remedies, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.