Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Tort: Negligence
Duty of care and the neighbour principle
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
Donoghue v Stevenson and the neighbour principle, the rise and fall of the Anns test, and where the duty stops — Bourhill v Young, omissions, third parties and Kent v Griffiths.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
State the neighbour principle.
Give the classic definition of negligence.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What three elements must a claimant prove in negligence?
Model answer
A claimant in negligence must prove that the defendant owed a duty of care. The claimant must then prove a breach of that duty. The claimant must finally prove that the breach caused damage that is not too remote.
- 2
Give the classic definition of negligence.
Model answer
Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks (1856) defined negligence as the omission to do something a reasonable man would do. Negligence also covers doing something a prudent and reasonable man would not do.
- 3
What were the facts and the decision in Donoghue v Stevenson [1932]?
Model answer
Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] concerned a decomposed snail in an opaque bottle of ginger beer. The House of Lords held that a manufacturer owes a duty of care to the ultimate consumer of the product.
- 4
State the neighbour principle.
Model answer
Lord Atkin's neighbour principle requires a person to take reasonable care to avoid acts likely to injure a neighbour. A neighbour is anyone so closely and directly affected by the act. The actor ought reasonably to have such a person in contemplation.
- 5
Why was the neighbour principle so important to the development of negligence?
Model answer
The neighbour principle supplied one general test in place of a list of separate duty situations. Negligence could then expand into new relationships as they arose.
- 6
What two-stage test did Anns v Merton London Borough Council [1978] lay down?
Model answer
Anns v Merton London Borough Council [1978] asked first whether there was enough proximity to raise a prima facie duty. The court then asked whether any policy consideration should reduce or negative that duty.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Tort: Negligence, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.