levo

Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort Law

Criticisms of the tort system

  • 3 things to know
  • Components 2 and 3

Overview

Slow, expensive, unpredictable and a forensic lottery — how few injured people recover at all, what the fault requirement does to the seriously disabled, and the alternatives to a claim.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Evaluation

Why is the tort system criticised as slow?

Evaluation

Why is the tort system criticised as expensive?

Evaluation

Explain the forensic lottery criticism of tort.

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    Why is the tort system criticised as slow?

    Model answer

    A contested personal injury claim can take several years to reach trial. An injured claimant often needs money for care long before the case is decided.

  2. 2

    Why is the tort system criticised as expensive?

    Model answer

    Legal costs can equal or exceed the damages recovered in a smaller claim. Money spent on lawyers and expert witnesses never reaches the injured person.

  3. 3

    Explain the forensic lottery criticism of tort.

    Model answer

    The forensic lottery criticism says that compensation turns on chance factors such as whether anybody happened to be at fault. Two people with identical injuries can therefore be treated completely differently.

  4. 4

    Why is the fault requirement said to be unfair to the seriously disabled?

    Model answer

    A person disabled by illness or by an accident nobody caused receives nothing from the law of tort. A person with an identical disability caused by a negligent driver may recover millions.

  5. 5

    What proportion of injured people actually recover damages in tort?

    Model answer

    Only a small minority of injured people ever recover damages in tort. Research for the Pearson Commission in 1978 found that fewer than one in ten obtained a tort award.

  6. 6

    How does the lump sum rule create injustice?

    Model answer

    Damages are usually assessed once and for all, so the court must predict the claimant's whole future. A claimant who does better or worse than predicted is over-compensated or under-compensated.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

See a huge jump in your memorisation

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The court sits in .
StrasbourgLondonParis

Blank Blitz consolidates the facts

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AAn interim injunction restrains publication before trial.
BPublication cannot be undone.
CAn injunction may be the only effective remedy.

Build It trains answer structure

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A Public Bill changes the general law.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort Law, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.