Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Contract: Remedies
Causation and remoteness of damage
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
Rule on remoteness of damage in contract, first limb of Hadley v Baxendale and second limb of Hadley v Baxendale.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Which case shows a breach that was the occasion rather than the cause?
How can an intervening act break the chain of causation?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What must a claimant prove about causation?
Model answer
The claimant must prove that the breach caused the loss claimed. The breach need not be the only cause, but it must be an effective one.
- 2
Which case shows a breach that was the occasion rather than the cause?
Model answer
Quinn v Burch Bros (Builders) Ltd [1966] concerned a contractor who failed to supply a stepladder. The plasterer's decision to use an unfooted trestle broke the chain of causation.
- 3
How can an intervening act break the chain of causation?
Model answer
An unreasonable act by the claimant or a third party may break the chain. The defendant is not liable for loss caused by that independent decision.
- 4
What is the rule on remoteness of damage in contract?
Model answer
Hadley v Baxendale (1854) restricts recovery to losses arising naturally or within the parties' contemplation. Losses outside both limbs are too remote.
- 5
What were the facts of Hadley v Baxendale (1854)?
Model answer
Hadley v Baxendale (1854) concerned a delayed delivery of a broken mill shaft by a carrier. Loss of profits during the stoppage was too remote, because the carrier had not been told the mill would stand idle.
- 6
What is the first limb of Hadley v Baxendale?
Model answer
The first limb covers loss arising naturally in the usual course of things. The defendant needs no special knowledge of that kind of loss.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Contract: Remedies, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.