Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Tort: Vicarious Liability
Frolic of his own, detours and journeys
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
Frolic of his own and difference between a detour and a frolic.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What is the difference between a detour and a frolic?
What did Storey v Ashton (1869) decide?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is meant by a frolic of his own?
Model answer
A frolic of his own is conduct so far removed from the employment that the employer escapes liability. Joel v Morison (1834) drew the line between a detour on the employer's business and a journey of the employee's own.
- 2
What is the difference between a detour and a frolic?
Model answer
A detour is a deviation from the route while still on the employer's business. A frolic is a separate journey undertaken for the employee's own purposes.
- 3
What did Storey v Ashton (1869) decide?
Model answer
A carman finished his round and then drove the employer's cart on a private errand. The court held the employer not liable, because it was an entirely new and independent journey.
- 4
What did Hilton v Thomas Burton (Rhodes) Ltd [1961] decide?
Model answer
Workmen took the employer's van several miles for a tea break and crashed on the way back. The court held the employer not liable, because the trip served only their own purposes.
- 5
What did Smith v Stages [1989] decide?
Model answer
An employee crashed while driving back from a job in another county, paid for his travelling time. The House of Lords held the employer liable, because travel in the employer's time and at its expense was in the course of employment.
- 6
Is travel between home and work in the course of employment?
Model answer
An ordinary commute to a fixed workplace is not in the course of employment. Travel between sites during the working day usually is.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Tort: Vicarious Liability, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.