levo

Judicial Precedent

The Court of Appeal and the exceptions in Young v Bristol Aeroplane

  • 3 things to know
  • Component 1

Overview

The three narrow escapes from the Court of Appeal's own past decisions, the extra freedom of the Criminal Division, and Lord Denning's failed attempt to widen them in Broome v Cassell and Davis v Johnson.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Numbers

What happened in Broome v Cassell and Co [1972]?

Numbers

Is the Court of Appeal bound by its own past decisions?

Key term

State the first exception in Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd [1944].

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    Is the Court of Appeal bound by its own past decisions?

    Model answer

    The Court of Appeal is bound by its own past decisions except in three situations. Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd [1944] identified those three exceptions.

  2. 2

    State the first exception in Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd [1944].

    Model answer

    The first exception applies where two of the court's own past decisions conflict with each other. The Court of Appeal may then choose which of the two to follow.

  3. 3

    State the second exception in Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd [1944].

    Model answer

    The second exception applies where a past Court of Appeal decision conflicts with a later decision of the highest court. The Court of Appeal must then follow the higher court.

  4. 4

    State the third exception in Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd [1944].

    Model answer

    The third exception applies where the earlier decision was given per incuriam. The Court of Appeal is then free to depart from it.

  5. 5

    What does per incuriam mean?

    Model answer

    Per incuriam means through lack of care. A decision is per incuriam if it was reached in ignorance of a relevant statute or binding authority.

  6. 6

    Give an example of the per incuriam exception being used.

    Model answer

    Williams v Fawcett [1986] departed from earlier Court of Appeal decisions about committal for breach of an undertaking. The earlier decisions had misread the county court rules and were treated as given per incuriam.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The court sits in .
StrasbourgLondonParis

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AAn interim injunction restrains publication before trial.
BPublication cannot be undone.
CAn injunction may be the only effective remedy.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A Public Bill changes the general law.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Judicial Precedent, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.