Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Judicial Precedent
The Court of Appeal and the exceptions in Young v Bristol Aeroplane
- 3 things to know
- Component 1
Overview
The three narrow escapes from the Court of Appeal's own past decisions, the extra freedom of the Criminal Division, and Lord Denning's failed attempt to widen them in Broome v Cassell and Davis v Johnson.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Is the Court of Appeal bound by its own past decisions?
State the first exception in Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd [1944].
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Is the Court of Appeal bound by its own past decisions?
Model answer
The Court of Appeal is bound by its own past decisions except in three situations. Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd [1944] identified those three exceptions.
- 2
State the first exception in Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd [1944].
Model answer
The first exception applies where two of the court's own past decisions conflict with each other. The Court of Appeal may then choose which of the two to follow.
- 3
State the second exception in Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd [1944].
Model answer
The second exception applies where a past Court of Appeal decision conflicts with a later decision of the highest court. The Court of Appeal must then follow the higher court.
- 4
State the third exception in Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co Ltd [1944].
Model answer
The third exception applies where the earlier decision was given per incuriam. The Court of Appeal is then free to depart from it.
- 5
What does per incuriam mean?
Model answer
Per incuriam means through lack of care. A decision is per incuriam if it was reached in ignorance of a relevant statute or binding authority.
- 6
Give an example of the per incuriam exception being used.
Model answer
Williams v Fawcett [1986] departed from earlier Court of Appeal decisions about committal for breach of an undertaking. The earlier decisions had misread the county court rules and were treated as given per incuriam.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Judicial Precedent, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.