Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Statutory Interpretation
The golden rule
- 3 things to know
- Component 1
Overview
Departing from the plain meaning to avoid absurdity — the narrow application choosing between two meanings in R v Allen, the wide application in Re Sigsworth and Adler v George, and how rarely either is used.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Which case contains the classic statement of the golden rule?
What is the narrow application of the golden rule?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
State the golden rule.
Model answer
The golden rule starts from the literal meaning but allows a court to depart from it to avoid an absurd result. The court modifies the words only so far as is needed to remove the absurdity.
- 2
Which case contains the classic statement of the golden rule?
Model answer
Grey v Pearson (1857) contains Lord Wensleydale's classic statement of the rule. The ordinary meaning is to be followed unless it leads to absurdity or inconsistency, in which case the meaning may be modified.
- 3
What is the narrow application of the golden rule?
Model answer
The narrow application lets a court pick between two possible meanings of the same word. The meaning that avoids the absurd outcome is chosen.
- 4
What did R v Allen (1872) decide?
Model answer
R v Allen (1872) held that marry in the bigamy offence meant going through a ceremony of marriage. Reading it as become legally married would have made the offence impossible to commit.
- 5
Which statute created the bigamy offence in R v Allen (1872)?
Model answer
The bigamy offence was created by section 57 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. The Court for Crown Cases Reserved gave the word marry a meaning that let the offence work.
- 6
What is the wide application of the golden rule?
Model answer
Under the wide application a court modifies words that have only one meaning to avoid a repugnant result. The court reads in or reads down words to prevent an outcome Parliament cannot have wanted.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Statutory Interpretation, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.