levo

Statutory Interpretation

The golden rule

  • 3 things to know
  • Component 1

Overview

Departing from the plain meaning to avoid absurdity — the narrow application choosing between two meanings in R v Allen, the wide application in Re Sigsworth and Adler v George, and how rarely either is used.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

State the golden rule.

Numbers

Which case contains the classic statement of the golden rule?

Key term

What is the narrow application of the golden rule?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    State the golden rule.

    Model answer

    The golden rule starts from the literal meaning but allows a court to depart from it to avoid an absurd result. The court modifies the words only so far as is needed to remove the absurdity.

  2. 2

    Which case contains the classic statement of the golden rule?

    Model answer

    Grey v Pearson (1857) contains Lord Wensleydale's classic statement of the rule. The ordinary meaning is to be followed unless it leads to absurdity or inconsistency, in which case the meaning may be modified.

  3. 3

    What is the narrow application of the golden rule?

    Model answer

    The narrow application lets a court pick between two possible meanings of the same word. The meaning that avoids the absurd outcome is chosen.

  4. 4

    What did R v Allen (1872) decide?

    Model answer

    R v Allen (1872) held that marry in the bigamy offence meant going through a ceremony of marriage. Reading it as become legally married would have made the offence impossible to commit.

  5. 5

    Which statute created the bigamy offence in R v Allen (1872)?

    Model answer

    The bigamy offence was created by section 57 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. The Court for Crown Cases Reserved gave the word marry a meaning that let the offence work.

  6. 6

    What is the wide application of the golden rule?

    Model answer

    Under the wide application a court modifies words that have only one meaning to avoid a repugnant result. The court reads in or reads down words to prevent an outcome Parliament cannot have wanted.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The court sits in .
StrasbourgLondonParis

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AAn interim injunction restrains publication before trial.
BPublication cannot be undone.
CAn injunction may be the only effective remedy.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A Public Bill changes the general law.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Statutory Interpretation, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.