Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Criminal Law: Capacity Defences
Insanity: the M'Naghten rules
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
Presumption from which the M'Naghten rules begin, three elements of the M'Naghten rules and defect of reason.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
State the presumption from which the M'Naghten rules begin.
State the three elements of the M'Naghten rules.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Where do the rules on insanity come from?
Model answer
The rules on insanity come from M'Naghten's Case (1843). The judges answered questions put to them by the House of Lords after the acquittal of Daniel M'Naghten.
- 2
State the presumption from which the M'Naghten rules begin.
Model answer
Every person is presumed sane and to possess a sufficient degree of reason to be responsible. The defence must displace that presumption.
- 3
State the three elements of the M'Naghten rules.
Model answer
The defendant must have suffered a defect of reason arising from a disease of the mind. The defect must have caused the defendant not to know the nature and quality of the act, or not to know that the act was wrong.
- 4
What is a defect of reason?
Model answer
A defect of reason is a deprivation of the power to reason. A temporary failure to use powers of reasoning is not enough.
- 5
Which case decided that absent-mindedness is not a defect of reason?
Model answer
R v Clarke [1972] held that momentary confusion or absent-mindedness is not a defect of reason. A woman with diabetes and depression who took goods from a supermarket had not lost her powers of reasoning.
- 6
What does not knowing the nature and quality of the act mean?
Model answer
The phrase covers a defendant unaware of the physical nature of what is being done. A defendant who cuts a throat believing it to be a loaf of bread does not know the nature of the act.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Criminal Law: Capacity Defences, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.