levo

Tort: Torts Connected to Land

Specific defences to nuisance: prescription and statutory authority

  • 3 things to know
  • Components 2 and 3

Overview

Defence of prescription in private nuisance and defence of statutory authority.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

What did Allen v Gulf Oil Refining Ltd [1981] decide?

Key term

What is the defence of prescription in private nuisance?

Key term

What did Sturges v Bridgman (1879) decide about prescription?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What is the defence of prescription in private nuisance?

    Model answer

    Prescription gives a right to continue a nuisance carried on for twenty years. The twenty years run from the time the activity first became a nuisance to that claimant.

  2. 2

    What did Sturges v Bridgman (1879) decide about prescription?

    Model answer

    A confectioner had used noisy machinery for more than twenty years before a doctor built a consulting room next door. The court rejected the defence, because the noise became a nuisance only when the consulting room was built.

  3. 3

    What is the defence of statutory authority?

    Model answer

    Statutory authority protects a defendant whose activity is authorised by an Act of Parliament. The nuisance must be an inevitable consequence of doing what the statute permits.

  4. 4

    What did Allen v Gulf Oil Refining Ltd [1981] decide?

    Model answer

    A private Act of Parliament authorised the construction and operation of an oil refinery. The House of Lords held the smell, noise and vibration to be an inevitable result of the authorised activity, so the defence succeeded.

  5. 5

    Is planning permission a defence to a claim in nuisance?

    Model answer

    Planning permission is not statutory authority and cannot authorise a nuisance. Wheeler v JJ Saunders Ltd [1996] confirmed that a planning consent gives no licence to wrong a neighbour.

  6. 6

    How does planning permission still matter after Coventry v Lawrence [2014]?

    Model answer

    Planning permission may be evidence of the character of the locality against which reasonableness is judged. The Supreme Court held in 2014 that permission neither authorises a nuisance nor is wholly irrelevant.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The court sits in .
StrasbourgLondonParis

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AAn interim injunction restrains publication before trial.
BPublication cannot be undone.
CAn injunction may be the only effective remedy.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A Public Bill changes the general law.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Tort: Torts Connected to Land, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.