Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Tort: Negligence
Legal causation, intervening acts and remoteness of damage
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
Difference between factual causation and legal causation, remoteness of damage and thin skull rule.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What breaks the chain of causation between a breach of duty and the claimant's damage?
What did McKew v Holland and Hannen and Cubitts (Scotland) Ltd [1969] decide?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is the difference between factual causation and legal causation?
Model answer
Factual causation asks whether the breach made any difference to what happened. Legal causation asks whether the law should treat the breach as the operative cause of the damage.
- 2
What breaks the chain of causation between a breach of duty and the claimant's damage?
Model answer
An intervening act that is both unforeseeable and unreasonable breaks the chain of causation. The defendant then escapes liability for the damage flowing from that act.
- 3
What did McKew v Holland and Hannen and Cubitts (Scotland) Ltd [1969] decide?
Model answer
A claimant with a leg weakened by the defendant's negligence went down a steep staircase with no handrail or help and fell. The House of Lords held that his own unreasonable conduct broke the chain of causation.
- 4
What did Wieland v Cyril Lord Carpets Ltd [1969] decide?
Model answer
A claimant fitted with a surgical collar could not use her bifocal glasses properly and fell down some stairs. The court held her conduct reasonable, so the chain of causation was not broken.
- 5
When does the act of a third party break the chain of causation?
Model answer
A third party's act breaks the chain where it is unforeseeable and independent of the defendant's breach. A foreseeable reaction to the danger the defendant created does not break the chain.
- 6
What did Knightley v Johns [1982] decide?
Model answer
A police inspector ordered an officer to ride the wrong way through a tunnel after a crash, and the officer was injured. The Court of Appeal held that the negligent order broke the chain of causation from the original crash.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Tort: Negligence, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.