Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary Offences
Consent
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
Four recognised exceptions where consent to harm is valid and position on consent to lawful chastisement of a child.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Which case established the general rule on consent to harm?
Name four recognised exceptions where consent to harm is valid.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
When is consent a defence to an offence against the person?
Model answer
Consent is a defence to assault and battery where the consent is genuine. Consent is generally no defence to actual bodily harm or anything more serious.
- 2
Which case established the general rule on consent to harm?
Model answer
R v Brown [1994] held that consent is no defence to actual bodily harm or worse unless a recognised exception applies. The House of Lords upheld convictions arising from consensual sadomasochistic acts.
- 3
Name four recognised exceptions where consent to harm is valid.
Model answer
Properly conducted sports and reasonable surgical interference are recognised exceptions. Tattooing and piercing, and rough horseplay, are two more.
- 4
Which case allowed consent to branding between spouses?
Model answer
R v Wilson [1996] quashed a conviction where a husband branded his initials on his wife's buttocks at her request. The court treated the act as akin to tattooing.
- 5
Which case concerned consent in the context of sport?
Model answer
R v Barnes [2004] held that a criminal prosecution should follow a sporting injury only where the conduct was sufficiently grave. Conduct within what could reasonably be expected on the field is not criminal.
- 6
Which case concerned consent and rough horseplay?
Model answer
R v Aitken [1992] quashed convictions where officers set fire to a colleague's fire-resistant suit during celebrations. Genuine belief in consent to horseplay could found a defence.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary Offences, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.