Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Criminal Law: General Elements of Liability
Coincidence of actus reus and mens rea
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
The requirement that conduct and fault meet at the same moment, and the two devices the courts use to get round it — the continuing act in Fagan and the single transaction in Thabo Meli and Church.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Why can strict application of the coincidence rule cause difficulty?
Name the two devices the courts use to satisfy the coincidence rule.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is the coincidence rule?
Model answer
The coincidence rule requires the actus reus and the mens rea to exist at the same time. An offence is not made out where the fault comes after the conduct is complete.
- 2
Why can strict application of the coincidence rule cause difficulty?
Model answer
A defendant may form the mens rea only after the conduct has begun or has finished. Courts have used two devices to avoid an unjust acquittal in those cases.
- 3
Name the two devices the courts use to satisfy the coincidence rule.
Model answer
The continuing act doctrine treats the conduct as lasting until the mens rea is formed. The series of acts doctrine treats connected acts as a single transaction.
- 4
Which case established the continuing act doctrine?
Model answer
Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1969] treated driving onto an officer's foot and refusing to move off as a continuing act. The mens rea formed during that continuing act completed the battery.
- 5
Which case established the single transaction approach?
Model answer
Thabo Meli v R [1954] upheld murder convictions where defendants beat a man and then rolled him over a cliff. The whole course of conduct was treated as one transaction.
- 6
Which case applied the single transaction approach to manslaughter?
Model answer
R v Church [1966] upheld a manslaughter conviction where a defendant threw into a river a woman he wrongly believed dead. The series of acts was treated as one continuing transaction.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Criminal Law: General Elements of Liability, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.