levo

Criminal Law: General Elements of Liability

Coincidence of actus reus and mens rea

  • 3 things to know
  • Components 2 and 3

Overview

The requirement that conduct and fault meet at the same moment, and the two devices the courts use to get round it — the continuing act in Fagan and the single transaction in Thabo Meli and Church.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

What is the coincidence rule?

Key term

Why can strict application of the coincidence rule cause difficulty?

Key term

Name the two devices the courts use to satisfy the coincidence rule.

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What is the coincidence rule?

    Model answer

    The coincidence rule requires the actus reus and the mens rea to exist at the same time. An offence is not made out where the fault comes after the conduct is complete.

  2. 2

    Why can strict application of the coincidence rule cause difficulty?

    Model answer

    A defendant may form the mens rea only after the conduct has begun or has finished. Courts have used two devices to avoid an unjust acquittal in those cases.

  3. 3

    Name the two devices the courts use to satisfy the coincidence rule.

    Model answer

    The continuing act doctrine treats the conduct as lasting until the mens rea is formed. The series of acts doctrine treats connected acts as a single transaction.

  4. 4

    Which case established the continuing act doctrine?

    Model answer

    Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [1969] treated driving onto an officer's foot and refusing to move off as a continuing act. The mens rea formed during that continuing act completed the battery.

  5. 5

    Which case established the single transaction approach?

    Model answer

    Thabo Meli v R [1954] upheld murder convictions where defendants beat a man and then rolled him over a cliff. The whole course of conduct was treated as one transaction.

  6. 6

    Which case applied the single transaction approach to manslaughter?

    Model answer

    R v Church [1966] upheld a manslaughter conviction where a defendant threw into a river a woman he wrongly believed dead. The series of acts was treated as one continuing transaction.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The court sits in .
StrasbourgLondonParis

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AAn interim injunction restrains publication before trial.
BPublication cannot be undone.
CAn injunction may be the only effective remedy.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A Public Bill changes the general law.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Criminal Law: General Elements of Liability, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.