Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Tort: Torts Connected to Land
Unreasonable user: locality, duration and utility
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
The balancing exercise at the heart of the tort — the character of the neighbourhood, how long and how often, the utility of what the defendant is doing, and what Coventry v Lawrence changed about locality.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What does unreasonable user mean in private nuisance?
Which factors does the court weigh in deciding unreasonable user?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What does unreasonable user mean in private nuisance?
Model answer
Unreasonable user is the balance a court strikes between the defendant's freedom to use land and the neighbour's right to enjoy it. The question is whether the interference goes beyond what a neighbour must tolerate.
- 2
Which factors does the court weigh in deciding unreasonable user?
Model answer
The court weighs the character of the locality and the duration and frequency of the interference. The intensity of the interference, the utility of the conduct and any malice are also relevant.
- 3
How does the character of the locality affect the question?
Model answer
An activity acceptable in an industrial district may be a nuisance in a quiet residential street. Sturges v Bridgman (1879) captured the point by contrasting Belgrave Square with Bermondsey.
- 4
When is the character of the locality irrelevant?
Model answer
The locality carries no weight where the nuisance causes physical damage to property. Only amenity nuisance is judged against the character of the neighbourhood.
- 5
What did Coventry v Lawrence [2014] say about the character of the locality?
Model answer
The Supreme Court held in 2014 that the character of a locality includes activities carried on with planning permission. An established activity can therefore shape the standard against which a later complaint is judged.
- 6
How does duration affect whether an interference is a nuisance?
Model answer
A long and continuous interference is far more likely to be a nuisance than a brief one. A temporary interference may still be actionable where it is severe.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Tort: Torts Connected to Land, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.