levo

Tort: Torts Connected to Land

Unreasonable user: locality, duration and utility

  • 3 things to know
  • Components 2 and 3

Overview

The balancing exercise at the heart of the tort — the character of the neighbourhood, how long and how often, the utility of what the defendant is doing, and what Coventry v Lawrence changed about locality.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Numbers

Is the public benefit of the defendant's activity a defence?

Key term

What does unreasonable user mean in private nuisance?

Key term

Which factors does the court weigh in deciding unreasonable user?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What does unreasonable user mean in private nuisance?

    Model answer

    Unreasonable user is the balance a court strikes between the defendant's freedom to use land and the neighbour's right to enjoy it. The question is whether the interference goes beyond what a neighbour must tolerate.

  2. 2

    Which factors does the court weigh in deciding unreasonable user?

    Model answer

    The court weighs the character of the locality and the duration and frequency of the interference. The intensity of the interference, the utility of the conduct and any malice are also relevant.

  3. 3

    How does the character of the locality affect the question?

    Model answer

    An activity acceptable in an industrial district may be a nuisance in a quiet residential street. Sturges v Bridgman (1879) captured the point by contrasting Belgrave Square with Bermondsey.

  4. 4

    When is the character of the locality irrelevant?

    Model answer

    The locality carries no weight where the nuisance causes physical damage to property. Only amenity nuisance is judged against the character of the neighbourhood.

  5. 5

    What did Coventry v Lawrence [2014] say about the character of the locality?

    Model answer

    The Supreme Court held in 2014 that the character of a locality includes activities carried on with planning permission. An established activity can therefore shape the standard against which a later complaint is judged.

  6. 6

    How does duration affect whether an interference is a nuisance?

    Model answer

    A long and continuous interference is far more likely to be a nuisance than a brief one. A temporary interference may still be actionable where it is severe.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The court sits in .
StrasbourgLondonParis

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AAn interim injunction restrains publication before trial.
BPublication cannot be undone.
CAn injunction may be the only effective remedy.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A Public Bill changes the general law.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Tort: Torts Connected to Land, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.