Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Human Rights: Rules and Theory
The role of the courts in regulating rights
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
How the common law protected liberty before 1998 through residual freedom and the principle of legality stated in Simms, and what sections 2 and 3 of the Human Rights Act now require of a judge.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
How did the common law protect freedom before 1998?
Which presumption protects a fundamental right when Parliament legislates in general words?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
How did the common law protect freedom before 1998?
Model answer
The common law protected freedom by supplying remedies against unlawful official action. A citizen sued in trespass or false imprisonment rather than claiming a breach of a right.
- 2
Which presumption protects a fundamental right when Parliament legislates in general words?
Model answer
The principle of legality presumes that Parliament does not intend to override fundamental rights by general words. Clear express language is required before a court will read a statute as removing such a right.
- 3
In which case did Lord Hoffmann state the principle of legality?
Model answer
Lord Hoffmann stated the principle of legality in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms [2000]. The case concerned prisoners seeking to speak to journalists about alleged miscarriages of justice.
- 4
What duty does section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 place on the courts?
Model answer
Section 3 requires legislation to be read and given effect compatibly with Convention rights so far as possible. The duty applies to legislation passed before as well as after the Act.
- 5
What must a court do with a judgment of the European Court of Human Rights?
Model answer
Section 2 of the Human Rights Act 1998 requires a court to take Strasbourg case law into account. A domestic court is not bound to follow a Strasbourg decision.
- 6
Can a magistrates' court declare a statute incompatible with a Convention right?
Model answer
Only the higher courts may make a declaration of incompatibility under section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998. A magistrates' court or a county court must apply the statute exactly as it stands.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Human Rights: Rules and Theory, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.