Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UK
Doctrines developed by the Strasbourg court
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
Margin of appreciation, principle of subsidiarity and positive obligation under the Convention.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Which case described the Convention as a living instrument?
What criticism is made of the living instrument approach?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What does it mean to call the Convention a living instrument?
Model answer
The living instrument doctrine reads the Convention in the light of present-day conditions. The meaning of a right can therefore develop as social attitudes and standards change.
- 2
Which case described the Convention as a living instrument?
Model answer
Tyrer v United Kingdom (1978) described the Convention as a living instrument. The Court held that judicial birching on the Isle of Man had become degrading punishment.
- 3
What criticism is made of the living instrument approach?
Model answer
Critics argue that the doctrine allows judges to add obligations no state ever agreed to accept. Defenders answer that freezing the Convention at 1950 would leave it useless today.
- 4
What is the margin of appreciation?
Model answer
The margin of appreciation is the latitude a state is allowed in deciding how to apply a qualified right. National authorities are treated as better placed to judge local conditions and needs.
- 5
Which case set out the margin of appreciation?
Model answer
Handyside v United Kingdom (1976) set out the margin of appreciation in a case about public morals. The Court accepted that no uniform European conception of morality existed.
- 6
When is the margin of appreciation wide, and when is it narrow?
Model answer
The margin is wide on questions of morality, national security and economic policy. The margin narrows sharply where an intimate aspect of private life or a core democratic freedom is at stake.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UK, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.