Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Tort: Vicarious Liability
Relationships akin to employment
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
How the doctrine reached beyond the contract of employment, through the Christian Brothers policy factors, Cox v Ministry of Justice on the prison kitchen and Armes on local authority foster carers.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What did Various Claimants v Catholic Child Welfare Society [2012] decide?
Which policy factors did the Supreme Court identify in the Christian Brothers case?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is a relationship akin to employment?
Model answer
A relationship akin to employment is close enough to employment to justify the same liability. The relationship need not involve a contract of service at all.
- 2
What did Various Claimants v Catholic Child Welfare Society [2012] decide?
Model answer
The Supreme Court held a religious institute vicariously liable for abuse by brothers teaching in a school. The brothers took no wage, but the relationship was akin to employment.
- 3
Which policy factors did the Supreme Court identify in the Christian Brothers case?
Model answer
The defendant had the means to compensate and the tort was committed on its behalf. The activity formed part of the defendant's business, the defendant created the risk, and the wrongdoer was under its control.
- 4
What did Cox v Ministry of Justice [2016] decide?
Model answer
A prisoner working in a prison kitchen negligently dropped a sack of rice on the catering manager. The Supreme Court held the Ministry of Justice vicariously liable, because the prisoner's work furthered its operations.
- 5
What did Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council [2017] decide?
Model answer
A local authority placed a child with foster parents who abused her. The Supreme Court held the authority vicariously liable, because fostering was integral to its childcare operation.
- 6
What did Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants [2020] decide?
Model answer
A self-employed doctor examined job applicants for a bank and assaulted a number of them. The Supreme Court held the bank not liable, because the doctor carried on business on his own account.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Tort: Vicarious Liability, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.