levo

Tort: Vicarious Liability

Relationships akin to employment

  • 3 things to know
  • Components 2 and 3

Overview

How the doctrine reached beyond the contract of employment, through the Christian Brothers policy factors, Cox v Ministry of Justice on the prison kitchen and Armes on local authority foster carers.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

What is a relationship akin to employment?

Key term

What did Various Claimants v Catholic Child Welfare Society [2012] decide?

Key term

Which policy factors did the Supreme Court identify in the Christian Brothers case?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What is a relationship akin to employment?

    Model answer

    A relationship akin to employment is close enough to employment to justify the same liability. The relationship need not involve a contract of service at all.

  2. 2

    What did Various Claimants v Catholic Child Welfare Society [2012] decide?

    Model answer

    The Supreme Court held a religious institute vicariously liable for abuse by brothers teaching in a school. The brothers took no wage, but the relationship was akin to employment.

  3. 3

    Which policy factors did the Supreme Court identify in the Christian Brothers case?

    Model answer

    The defendant had the means to compensate and the tort was committed on its behalf. The activity formed part of the defendant's business, the defendant created the risk, and the wrongdoer was under its control.

  4. 4

    What did Cox v Ministry of Justice [2016] decide?

    Model answer

    A prisoner working in a prison kitchen negligently dropped a sack of rice on the catering manager. The Supreme Court held the Ministry of Justice vicariously liable, because the prisoner's work furthered its operations.

  5. 5

    What did Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council [2017] decide?

    Model answer

    A local authority placed a child with foster parents who abused her. The Supreme Court held the authority vicariously liable, because fostering was integral to its childcare operation.

  6. 6

    What did Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants [2020] decide?

    Model answer

    A self-employed doctor examined job applicants for a bank and assaulted a number of them. The Supreme Court held the bank not liable, because the doctor carried on business on his own account.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The court sits in .
StrasbourgLondonParis

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AAn interim injunction restrains publication before trial.
BPublication cannot be undone.
CAn injunction may be the only effective remedy.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A Public Bill changes the general law.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Tort: Vicarious Liability, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.