levo

Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic Duress

Fraudulent misrepresentation

  • 3 things to know
  • Components 2 and 3

Overview

Derry v Peek and the dishonest state of mind it requires, the tort of deceit, how damages for deceit are measured after Smith New Court, and why claimants often plead the 1967 Act instead.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Numbers

Define fraudulent misrepresentation.

Numbers

What were the facts of Derry v Peek (1889)?

Key term

What does recklessness mean in the context of fraud?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    Define fraudulent misrepresentation.

    Model answer

    Fraudulent misrepresentation is a false statement made knowingly, without belief in its truth, or recklessly. Derry v Peek (1889) laid down that definition.

  2. 2

    What were the facts of Derry v Peek (1889)?

    Model answer

    Derry v Peek (1889) concerned a prospectus stating that a tramway company could use steam power. The directors honestly believed consent would be given, so the claim in deceit failed.

  3. 3

    What does recklessness mean in the context of fraud?

    Model answer

    Recklessness means not caring whether the statement is true or false. Carelessness alone falls short of that standard.

  4. 4

    Is an honest but unreasonable belief a defence to fraud?

    Model answer

    An honest belief in the truth of a statement defeats a claim in deceit. The belief need not be a reasonable one, although unreasonableness is evidence against honesty.

  5. 5

    Which tort corresponds to fraudulent misrepresentation?

    Model answer

    Fraudulent misrepresentation gives rise to the tort of deceit. Damages in deceit are available in addition to rescission.

  6. 6

    How are damages for deceit measured?

    Model answer

    Damages in deceit cover all losses flowing directly from the fraudulent statement. Doyle v Olby (Ironmongers) Ltd [1969] confirmed that remoteness is no bar in fraud.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The court sits in .
StrasbourgLondonParis

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AAn interim injunction restrains publication before trial.
BPublication cannot be undone.
CAn injunction may be the only effective remedy.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A Public Bill changes the general law.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic Duress, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.