Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Criminal Law: Capacity Defences
Drunken mistake and criticism of the capacity defences
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
R v O'Grady and section 76(5) of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 refusing a drunken mistake in self-defence, why Jaggard v Dickinson sits so awkwardly beside it, and the criticisms the whole area attracts.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Can a drunken mistake be relied on in self-defence?
Which case confirmed the approach in R v O'Grady [1987]?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Can a drunken mistake be relied on in self-defence?
Model answer
R v O'Grady [1987] held that a defendant cannot rely on a mistake about the need for force induced by voluntary intoxication. The defendant is judged on the facts as a sober person would have seen them.
- 2
Which case confirmed the approach in R v O'Grady [1987]?
Model answer
R v Hatton [2005] confirmed that a drunken mistake cannot support self-defence even on a murder charge. The Court of Appeal applied O'Grady to specific intent offences.
- 3
Which statute now states the rule on drunken mistake in self-defence?
Model answer
Section 76 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 states the rule. Subsection (5) excludes any mistaken belief attributable to voluntary intoxication.
- 4
Why is the rule on drunken mistake criticised?
Model answer
The rule denies a defence to a defendant who genuinely believed force was necessary. Critics say it conflicts with the general rule that an honest mistake is judged on the facts as believed.
- 5
Why does Jaggard v Dickinson [1981] sit awkwardly with the rule on drunken mistake?
Model answer
Jaggard v Dickinson [1981] allowed a drunken belief in consent for criminal damage. The result depends on the wording of the statutory defence rather than on principle.
- 6
Give one criticism of the M'Naghten rules as a test of insanity.
Model answer
The rules date from 1843 and take no account of modern psychiatry. Conditions such as epilepsy and diabetes are classified as insanity although they are not mental illnesses.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Criminal Law: Capacity Defences, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.