levo

Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary Offences

  • 10 subtopics
  • 30 things to know
  • Components 2 and 3
  • Criminal Law, one of four areas of which three are studied

What Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary Offences covers

Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary Offences is examined in Components 2 and 3, if criminal law is one of the three areas you sit. It covers mistake as a defence, self-defence and the prevention of crime, reasonable force and householder cases, duress by threats and the Graham test, limits on duress: murder, association and evasive action, duress of circumstances, necessity, consent, attempt: the actus reus and more than merely preparatory and attempt: mens rea and impossible attempts.

Where it is assessed

Components 2 and 3

Substantive Law in Practice and Perspectives of Substantive Law, if this is one of your three areas.

Check the Eduqas specification ↗

The 10 subtopics

Each one has its own page.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Numbers

To which offences is duress of circumstances available?

Key term

State the three conditions for necessity identified in Re A (Conjoined Twins) [2001].

Key term

How can a mistake of fact assist a defendant?

Numbers

What are the two sources of the law on self-defence?

Key term

What is the householder defence?

Key term

What is the defence of duress by threats?

Numbers

Is duress a defence to murder?

Key term

When is consent a defence to an offence against the person?

Numbers

Which statute defines a criminal attempt?

Key term

State the mens rea of attempt.

Key term

Is a mistake of law a defence?

Numbers

Which statute clarified the law on self-defence?

Numbers

Which provision creates the householder defence?

Key term

Is duress a justification or an excuse?

Numbers

Is duress a defence to attempted murder?

Key term

What is duress of circumstances?

Key term

What is the defence of necessity?

Numbers

Which case established the general rule on consent to harm?

Key term

State the actus reus of attempt.

Numbers

What intent is required for attempted murder?

Key term

Must a mistake be reasonable to negate mens rea?

Key term

State the two questions a court asks in self-defence.

Key term

What is the test of reasonableness in a householder case?

Numbers

Which case sets out the test for duress?

Key term

To which other offence is duress unavailable?

Numbers

Which case first recognised duress of circumstances?

Numbers

Which case rejected necessity as a defence to murder?

Key term

Name four recognised exceptions where consent to harm is valid.

Key term

To which offences does the law of attempt apply?

Key term

Why is the mens rea for attempted murder higher than for murder?

Take Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary Offences further

The same content, four other ways.

Questions from this topic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    How can a mistake of fact assist a defendant?

    Model answer

    A mistake of fact may prevent the defendant from forming the mens rea of the offence. The defendant is then judged on the facts as they were believed to be.

  2. 2

    Is a mistake of law a defence?

    Model answer

    A mistake about the criminal law is no defence. Ignorance that conduct is prohibited does not excuse the defendant.

  3. 3

    Must a mistake be reasonable to negate mens rea?

    Model answer

    A mistake need only be genuine to negate mens rea. Unreasonableness is evidence that the mistake was not genuinely made.

  4. 4

    Which case established that an honest mistake suffices in self-defence?

    Model answer

    R v Williams (Gladstone) (1987) held that a defendant is judged on the facts as honestly believed. A man who intervened wrongly believing an assault was taking place could rely on the mistake.

  5. 5

    Which Privy Council decision confirmed the Gladstone Williams approach?

    Model answer

    Beckford v R [1988] confirmed that the belief need only be honest rather than reasonable. A police officer who mistakenly believed he was about to be shot could rely on self-defence.

  6. 6

    Which statutory provision now states the rule on mistaken belief in self-defence?

    Model answer

    Section 76(4) of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 states the rule. The defendant is judged on the facts as genuinely believed, whether or not the belief was reasonable.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The court sits in .
StrasbourgLondonParis

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AAn interim injunction restrains publication before trial.
BPublication cannot be undone.
CAn injunction may be the only effective remedy.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A Public Bill changes the general law.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary Offences revision questions

What does Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary Offences cover in Eduqas A-Level Law?
10 subtopics: mistake as a defence, self-defence and the prevention of crime, reasonable force and householder cases, duress by threats and the graham test, limits on duress: murder, association and evasive action, duress of circumstances, necessity, consent, attempt: the actus reus and more than merely preparatory and attempt: mens rea and impossible attempts. Each one has its own page with questions and model answers.
How is Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary Offences organised?
By the Eduqas A150QS specification, subtopic by subtopic, so it matches the order you are taught it in.

Every question in Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary Offences, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.