Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary Offences
- 10 subtopics
- 30 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
- Criminal Law, one of four areas of which three are studied
What Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary Offences covers
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary Offences is examined in Components 2 and 3, if criminal law is one of the three areas you sit. It covers mistake as a defence, self-defence and the prevention of crime, reasonable force and householder cases, duress by threats and the Graham test, limits on duress: murder, association and evasive action, duress of circumstances, necessity, consent, attempt: the actus reus and more than merely preparatory and attempt: mens rea and impossible attempts.
Where it is assessed
Components 2 and 3
Substantive Law in Practice and Perspectives of Substantive Law, if this is one of your three areas.
Check the Eduqas specification ↗The 10 subtopics
Each one has its own page.
- Mistake as a defenceA mistake of fact that negatives mens rea against a mistake of law that does not, and why an honest mistake is enough in self-defence after Gladstone Williams and Beckford.Open →
- Self-defence and the prevention of crimeTwo sources of the law on self-defence, two questions a court asks in self-defence and effect of using excessive force in self-defence.Open →
- Reasonable force and householder casesHouseholder defence and test of reasonableness in a householder case.Open →
- Duress by threats and the Graham testDefence of duress by threats, first limb of the Graham test and second limb of the Graham test.Open →
- Limits on duress: murder, association and evasive actionR v Howe on murder and R v Gotts on attempted murder, the voluntary association rule in Hasan, and the requirement that the defendant take any reasonable chance to escape.Open →
- Duress of circumstancesThe defence recognised in Willer and extended through Conway and Martin, with the two-limb test settled in R v Martin — a good cause to fear death or serious injury, and a sober person of reasonable firmness who would have acted the same way.Open →
- NecessityR v Dudley and Stephens refusing the defence to shipwrecked sailors, the sentence they actually served, and the narrow medical cases from Re F to Re A that show the courts have not shut the door entirely.Open →
- ConsentFour recognised exceptions where consent to harm is valid and position on consent to lawful chastisement of a child.Open →
- Attempt: the actus reus and more than merely preparatorySection 1(1) of the Criminal Attempts Act 1981, the more than merely preparatory test, which offences can be attempted, and the division of labour between judge and jury in deciding where preparation ends.Open →
- Attempt: mens rea and impossible attemptsMens rea of attempt, legal impossibility and attempt to do the impossible.Open →
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
State the three conditions for necessity identified in Re A (Conjoined Twins) [2001].
How can a mistake of fact assist a defendant?
What are the two sources of the law on self-defence?
What is the householder defence?
What is the defence of duress by threats?
Is duress a defence to murder?
When is consent a defence to an offence against the person?
Which statute defines a criminal attempt?
State the mens rea of attempt.
Is a mistake of law a defence?
Which statute clarified the law on self-defence?
Which provision creates the householder defence?
Is duress a justification or an excuse?
Is duress a defence to attempted murder?
What is duress of circumstances?
What is the defence of necessity?
Which case established the general rule on consent to harm?
State the actus reus of attempt.
What intent is required for attempted murder?
Must a mistake be reasonable to negate mens rea?
State the two questions a court asks in self-defence.
What is the test of reasonableness in a householder case?
Which case sets out the test for duress?
To which other offence is duress unavailable?
Which case first recognised duress of circumstances?
Which case rejected necessity as a defence to murder?
Name four recognised exceptions where consent to harm is valid.
To which offences does the law of attempt apply?
Why is the mens rea for attempted murder higher than for murder?
Take Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary Offences further
The same content, four other ways.
Questions from this topic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
How can a mistake of fact assist a defendant?
Model answer
A mistake of fact may prevent the defendant from forming the mens rea of the offence. The defendant is then judged on the facts as they were believed to be.
- 2
Is a mistake of law a defence?
Model answer
A mistake about the criminal law is no defence. Ignorance that conduct is prohibited does not excuse the defendant.
- 3
Must a mistake be reasonable to negate mens rea?
Model answer
A mistake need only be genuine to negate mens rea. Unreasonableness is evidence that the mistake was not genuinely made.
- 4
Which case established that an honest mistake suffices in self-defence?
Model answer
R v Williams (Gladstone) (1987) held that a defendant is judged on the facts as honestly believed. A man who intervened wrongly believing an assault was taking place could rely on the mistake.
- 5
Which Privy Council decision confirmed the Gladstone Williams approach?
Model answer
Beckford v R [1988] confirmed that the belief need only be honest rather than reasonable. A police officer who mistakenly believed he was about to be shot could rely on self-defence.
- 6
Which statutory provision now states the rule on mistaken belief in self-defence?
Model answer
Section 76(4) of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 states the rule. The defendant is judged on the facts as genuinely believed, whether or not the belief was reasonable.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary Offences revision questions
- What does Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary Offences cover in Eduqas A-Level Law?
- 10 subtopics: mistake as a defence, self-defence and the prevention of crime, reasonable force and householder cases, duress by threats and the graham test, limits on duress: murder, association and evasive action, duress of circumstances, necessity, consent, attempt: the actus reus and more than merely preparatory and attempt: mens rea and impossible attempts. Each one has its own page with questions and model answers.
- How is Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary Offences organised?
- By the Eduqas A150QS specification, subtopic by subtopic, so it matches the order you are taught it in.
Every question in Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary Offences, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.