Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Statutory Interpretation
The rules of language
- 3 things to know
- Component 1
Overview
Rules of language in statutory interpretation, ejusdem generis rule and expressio unius est exclusio alterius.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What did Muir v Keay (1875) decide?
What are the rules of language in statutory interpretation?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What are the rules of language in statutory interpretation?
Model answer
The rules of language are three Latin maxims judges use to read a word in the light of the words around it. The maxims are ejusdem generis, expressio unius est exclusio alterius and noscitur a sociis.
- 2
Explain the ejusdem generis rule.
Model answer
Ejusdem generis means that general words following a list of specific words are limited to the same kind of thing. The specific words must form a recognisable class before the rule applies.
- 3
What did Powell v Kempton Park Racecourse [1899] decide?
Model answer
Powell v Kempton Park Racecourse [1899] held that an outdoor betting ring was not a house, office, room or other place. The listed words all described indoor places, so the general words were limited to indoor places.
- 4
What did Allen v Emmerson [1944] show about the limits of ejusdem generis?
Model answer
Allen v Emmerson [1944] held that a funfair fell within the words theatres and other places of amusement. Only one specific word had been used, so no class existed to limit the general words.
- 5
Explain expressio unius est exclusio alterius.
Model answer
Expressio unius est exclusio alterius means that expressly mentioning one thing excludes others of the same type. The rule applies where a list stands alone with no general words after it.
- 6
What did R v Inhabitants of Sedgley (1831) decide?
Model answer
R v Inhabitants of Sedgley (1831) held that a rate on lands, houses and coalmines did not extend to limestone mines. The express mention of coalmines excluded mines of every other kind.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Statutory Interpretation, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.