Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Human Rights: Enforcement
Interpretation and Strasbourg case law
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
Mirror principle, judicial dialogue between London and Strasbourg and reading down.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What does section 3 of the Human Rights Act require?
How strong is the interpretive obligation under section 3?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What does section 2 of the Human Rights Act require of a court?
Model answer
Section 2 requires a court to take into account relevant judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. The court must consider that case law whenever a Convention right arises. The court is not bound to follow it.
- 2
Why does section 2 say take into account rather than follow?
Model answer
Parliament chose to preserve the authority of domestic courts rather than bind them to Strasbourg. Domestic courts may therefore depart from Strasbourg where the case law is unclear or has misunderstood domestic law.
- 3
What is the mirror principle?
Model answer
The mirror principle is the approach under which domestic courts keep pace with Strasbourg jurisprudence, no more and no less. Critics argue it makes domestic courts followers rather than developers of rights.
- 4
When may a domestic court decline to follow Strasbourg?
Model answer
A domestic court may decline where a Strasbourg decision rests on a misunderstanding of domestic law or procedure. A court may also decline where the point has not been decided consistently by a Grand Chamber.
- 5
What is the judicial dialogue between London and Strasbourg?
Model answer
Judicial dialogue is the exchange in which a domestic court explains why it disagrees and Strasbourg reconsiders. The approach to hearsay evidence in criminal trials is the example usually given of the process working.
- 6
What does section 3 of the Human Rights Act require?
Model answer
Section 3 requires legislation to be read and given effect, so far as it is possible to do so, in a way compatible with Convention rights. The duty applies to legislation whenever enacted.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Human Rights: Enforcement, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.