levo

Tort: Negligence

Factual causation and the but for test

  • 3 things to know
  • Components 2 and 3

Overview

Barnett and the but for question, the material contribution exceptions from McGhee to Fairchild, Wilsher on competing causes, and how the law handles successive injuries and loss of a chance.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

What does the but for test ask in a claim in negligence?

Key term

What were the facts of Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee [1969]?

Key term

What standard of proof applies to causation in negligence?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What does the but for test ask in a claim in negligence?

    Model answer

    The but for test asks whether the claimant's damage would have happened but for the defendant's breach of duty. Damage that would have occurred anyway is not caused by the breach.

  2. 2

    What were the facts of Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee [1969]?

    Model answer

    A night watchman who had drunk tea laced with arsenic was sent away by a casualty doctor and later died. The hospital was in breach of duty but escaped liability, because he would have died even with treatment.

  3. 3

    What standard of proof applies to causation in negligence?

    Model answer

    The claimant must prove causation on the balance of probabilities. Loss of a chance of a better medical outcome is generally not enough.

  4. 4

    What did Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] decide?

    Model answer

    A premature baby went blind after receiving excess oxygen, but five possible causes were present. The House of Lords held the claim failed, because the claimant could not prove which cause was responsible.

  5. 5

    What exception did McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] create?

    Model answer

    A worker developed dermatitis because brick dust stayed on his skin when no showers were provided. The House of Lords allowed the claim on the basis that the breach materially increased the risk of injury.

  6. 6

    What did Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] decide?

    Model answer

    Several employers had each exposed a worker to asbestos, and medical science could not say which exposure caused the mesothelioma. The House of Lords held each employer liable for materially increasing the risk.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The court sits in .
StrasbourgLondonParis

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AAn interim injunction restrains publication before trial.
BPublication cannot be undone.
CAn injunction may be the only effective remedy.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A Public Bill changes the general law.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Tort: Negligence, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.