Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Tort: Negligence
Factual causation and the but for test
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
Barnett and the but for question, the material contribution exceptions from McGhee to Fairchild, Wilsher on competing causes, and how the law handles successive injuries and loss of a chance.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What were the facts of Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee [1969]?
What standard of proof applies to causation in negligence?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What does the but for test ask in a claim in negligence?
Model answer
The but for test asks whether the claimant's damage would have happened but for the defendant's breach of duty. Damage that would have occurred anyway is not caused by the breach.
- 2
What were the facts of Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee [1969]?
Model answer
A night watchman who had drunk tea laced with arsenic was sent away by a casualty doctor and later died. The hospital was in breach of duty but escaped liability, because he would have died even with treatment.
- 3
What standard of proof applies to causation in negligence?
Model answer
The claimant must prove causation on the balance of probabilities. Loss of a chance of a better medical outcome is generally not enough.
- 4
What did Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] decide?
Model answer
A premature baby went blind after receiving excess oxygen, but five possible causes were present. The House of Lords held the claim failed, because the claimant could not prove which cause was responsible.
- 5
What exception did McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] create?
Model answer
A worker developed dermatitis because brick dust stayed on his skin when no showers were provided. The House of Lords allowed the claim on the basis that the breach materially increased the risk of injury.
- 6
What did Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] decide?
Model answer
Several employers had each exposed a worker to asbestos, and medical science could not say which exposure caused the mesothelioma. The House of Lords held each employer liable for materially increasing the risk.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Tort: Negligence, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.