Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
The standard owed to trespassers and defences under the 1984 Act
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
Discharging the duty by warning or discouragement under section 1(5), the section 1(6) volenti provision, and the obvious-danger line drawn by Ratcliff v McConnell and Tomlinson v Congleton.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Is a warning notice more effective against a trespasser than against a visitor?
What does section 1(6) of the Occupiers' Liability Act 1984 provide?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
How may an occupier discharge the duty under section 1(5) of the Occupiers' Liability Act 1984?
Model answer
Section 1(5) lets the occupier discharge the duty by taking reasonable steps to warn of the danger. The occupier may instead take reasonable steps to discourage people from running the risk.
- 2
Is a warning notice more effective against a trespasser than against a visitor?
Model answer
A warning to a trespasser need only be reasonable in the circumstances rather than enough to make the person safe. A clear sign therefore goes further under the 1984 Act than under the 1957 Act.
- 3
What does section 1(6) of the Occupiers' Liability Act 1984 provide?
Model answer
Section 1(6) provides that no duty is owed to a person who willingly accepts the risk. Volenti is a complete answer to a claim brought by a trespasser.
- 4
What did Ratcliff v McConnell [1999] decide?
Model answer
A student climbed into a locked college swimming pool at night and dived into the shallow end. The Court of Appeal held no duty was owed, because the risk of diving into shallow water was obvious and willingly accepted.
- 5
What did Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council [2003] decide?
Model answer
A young man dived into a shallow lake in a country park despite prominent notices and broke his neck. The House of Lords held no duty was owed, because the danger came from his own actions and not from the state of the premises.
- 6
What did the House of Lords say in Tomlinson about the social value of open land?
Model answer
The House of Lords stressed that spoiling or closing an amenity to prevent rare accidents is not reasonable. Lord Hoffmann warned against the cost to the public of removing every risk from open country.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Tort: Occupiers' Liability, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.