Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Tort: Torts Connected to Land
Specific defences to Rylands v Fletcher
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
Defence of consent under Rylands v Fletcher, defence of act of a stranger and defence of act of God.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What did Peters v Prince of Wales Theatre [1943] decide?
What is the defence of act of a stranger?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is the defence of consent under Rylands v Fletcher?
Model answer
A claimant who consented to the accumulation cannot complain of the escape. Consent is implied where the thing accumulated serves the common benefit of both parties.
- 2
What did Peters v Prince of Wales Theatre [1943] decide?
Model answer
A sprinkler system installed for fire safety burst and flooded a shop in the same building. The court held the claimant had impliedly consented, because the system served the common benefit of both.
- 3
What is the defence of act of a stranger?
Model answer
A defendant escapes liability where the escape was caused by the unforeseeable act of a stranger. A stranger is a person over whom the defendant has no control.
- 4
What did Perry v Kendricks Transport Ltd [1956] decide?
Model answer
Boys threw a lighted match into the petrol tank of a disused coach and a child was injured. The Court of Appeal held the defendant not liable, because the escape was caused by strangers.
- 5
How does Rickards v Lothian illustrate the act of a stranger?
Model answer
An unknown person deliberately blocked a basin and turned on the tap. The Privy Council held the occupier not liable for that deliberate act of a third party.
- 6
What is the defence of act of God?
Model answer
Act of God covers a natural event so extreme that no human foresight could guard against it. The defence is very narrow and rarely succeeds.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Tort: Torts Connected to Land, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.