levo

Tort: Torts Connected to Land

Specific defences to Rylands v Fletcher

  • 3 things to know
  • Components 2 and 3

Overview

Defence of consent under Rylands v Fletcher, defence of act of a stranger and defence of act of God.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

What is the defence of consent under Rylands v Fletcher?

Key term

What did Peters v Prince of Wales Theatre [1943] decide?

Key term

What is the defence of act of a stranger?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What is the defence of consent under Rylands v Fletcher?

    Model answer

    A claimant who consented to the accumulation cannot complain of the escape. Consent is implied where the thing accumulated serves the common benefit of both parties.

  2. 2

    What did Peters v Prince of Wales Theatre [1943] decide?

    Model answer

    A sprinkler system installed for fire safety burst and flooded a shop in the same building. The court held the claimant had impliedly consented, because the system served the common benefit of both.

  3. 3

    What is the defence of act of a stranger?

    Model answer

    A defendant escapes liability where the escape was caused by the unforeseeable act of a stranger. A stranger is a person over whom the defendant has no control.

  4. 4

    What did Perry v Kendricks Transport Ltd [1956] decide?

    Model answer

    Boys threw a lighted match into the petrol tank of a disused coach and a child was injured. The Court of Appeal held the defendant not liable, because the escape was caused by strangers.

  5. 5

    How does Rickards v Lothian illustrate the act of a stranger?

    Model answer

    An unknown person deliberately blocked a basin and turned on the tap. The Privy Council held the occupier not liable for that deliberate act of a third party.

  6. 6

    What is the defence of act of God?

    Model answer

    Act of God covers a natural event so extreme that no human foresight could guard against it. The defence is very narrow and rarely succeeds.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The court sits in .
StrasbourgLondonParis

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AAn interim injunction restrains publication before trial.
BPublication cannot be undone.
CAn injunction may be the only effective remedy.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A Public Bill changes the general law.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Tort: Torts Connected to Land, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.