Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic Duress
Negligent misrepresentation
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
Section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 and the fiction of fraud, the reversed burden of proof, the criticism of Royscot Trust v Rogerson, and the Hedley Byrne route that runs alongside it.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What does section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 provide?
Why is section 2(1) called the fiction of fraud?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is negligent misrepresentation?
Model answer
Negligent misrepresentation is a false statement made carelessly and without reasonable grounds for belief. The maker is honest but has failed to take proper care.
- 2
What does section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 provide?
Model answer
Section 2(1) allows damages where a false statement induces a contract and causes loss. The maker escapes liability only by proving reasonable grounds for believing the statement true.
- 3
Why is section 2(1) called the fiction of fraud?
Model answer
Section 2(1) makes the maker liable as if the statement had been made fraudulently. Royscot Trust v Rogerson [1991] therefore applied the deceit measure of damages.
- 4
Why is Royscot Trust v Rogerson [1991] criticised?
Model answer
Royscot Trust v Rogerson [1991] gives a careless statement the same wide damages as a dishonest one. Critics argue that Parliament cannot have intended that result.
- 5
Who bears the burden of proof under section 2(1)?
Model answer
The maker of the statement must prove reasonable grounds for the belief held. The reversed burden makes section 2(1) attractive to claimants.
- 6
Which case shows a defendant failing to discharge the burden under section 2(1)?
Model answer
Howard Marine and Dredging Co v A Ogden & Sons (Excavations) Ltd [1978] concerned a false statement about two barges. The owners misstated the carrying capacity and had relied on a register entry rather than their own documents.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic Duress, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.