Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Warnings, exclusion of liability and defences to a visitor's claim
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
When a section 2(4)(a) warning is enough to discharge the duty, the difference between warning and excluding, and the limits the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and the Consumer Rights Act 2015 put on exclusion.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What does section 2(4)(a) of the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 say about warnings?
When will a warning be enough to discharge the duty to a visitor?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What does section 2(4)(a) of the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 say about warnings?
Model answer
Section 2(4)(a) provides that a warning does not discharge the duty unless it was enough to make the visitor reasonably safe. A bare notice of danger is not automatically a defence.
- 2
When will a warning be enough to discharge the duty to a visitor?
Model answer
A warning is enough where it tells the visitor what the danger is and how to avoid it. A sign saying a bridge is unsafe is useless where that bridge is the only way across.
- 3
Does a warning have to be in writing?
Model answer
A warning may be given orally or by a notice, and either can satisfy section 2(4)(a). What matters is whether the warning in fact enabled the visitor to be reasonably safe.
- 4
What is the difference between a warning and an exclusion of liability?
Model answer
A warning tells the visitor about a danger so that the visitor can avoid it. An exclusion tries to take away the visitor's right to sue if injury happens anyway.
- 5
Can an occupier exclude the common duty of care?
Model answer
Section 2(1) of the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 allows an occupier to exclude or restrict the duty by agreement or notice. Statute has since cut that freedom down substantially.
- 6
How does the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 limit exclusion by an occupier?
Model answer
Section 2(1) of the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 applies to business liability. A business occupier cannot exclude liability for death or personal injury caused by negligence. Liability for other loss may be excluded only so far as it is reasonable.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Tort: Occupiers' Liability, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.