levo

Human Rights: Enforcement

Judicial review: the grounds

  • 3 things to know
  • Components 2 and 3

Overview

Judicial review, illegality as a ground of review and fettering a discretion.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

What is an improper delegation?

Key term

What is a legitimate expectation?

Key term

What is judicial review?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What is judicial review?

    Model answer

    Judicial review is the process by which the courts supervise the lawfulness of decisions by public bodies. The court examines how a decision was reached rather than whether it was the right decision.

  2. 2

    Why is judicial review described as supervisory rather than appellate?

    Model answer

    An appeal asks whether the decision was correct on the merits. Judicial review asks only whether the decision-maker acted lawfully, rationally and fairly, so the court does not substitute its own view.

  3. 3

    What are the three traditional grounds of judicial review?

    Model answer

    Illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety are the three grounds. Lord Diplock set them out in the case concerning the ban on trade union membership at the Government Communications Headquarters in 1985.

  4. 4

    What is illegality as a ground of review?

    Model answer

    Illegality means the decision-maker misunderstood or exceeded the legal power conferred. Acting outside the statutory purpose falls within it. Taking irrelevant considerations into account, or fettering a discretion, does too.

  5. 5

    What is meant by fettering a discretion?

    Model answer

    Fettering a discretion is applying a rigid policy without considering whether an exception should be made. A body given discretion must actually exercise it in each case.

  6. 6

    What is an improper delegation?

    Model answer

    An improper delegation occurs where a body entrusted with a power allows another to exercise it. Certain administrative decisions may be taken by officials on a minister's behalf, but a decision entrusted to a named body must be made by that body.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The court sits in .
StrasbourgLondonParis

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AAn interim injunction restrains publication before trial.
BPublication cannot be undone.
CAn injunction may be the only effective remedy.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A Public Bill changes the general law.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Human Rights: Enforcement, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.