Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UK
The impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 in the courts
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
Mirror principle and act extending the state's duty to protect life.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Which case read words into the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 to protect a fair trial?
What is the limit on the interpretive power in section 3?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
How far can a court stretch a statute under section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998?
Model answer
Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] read a Rent Act 1977 succession right in favour of a surviving same-sex partner. Section 3 therefore permits a strained reading and even the reading in of words.
- 2
Which case read words into the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 to protect a fair trial?
Model answer
R v A (No 2) [2001] read a further exception into the restriction on questioning a complainant about previous sexual history. The House of Lords used section 3 to secure compliance with Article 6.
- 3
What is the limit on the interpretive power in section 3?
Model answer
A court may not adopt a reading that goes against a fundamental feature of the legislation. Interpretation crossing that line becomes amendment, and amendment is a task for Parliament.
- 4
Which case produced a declaration of incompatibility about the legal recognition of gender?
Model answer
Bellinger v Bellinger [2003] declared the marriage provisions of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 incompatible with Articles 8 and 12. Parliament responded by passing the Gender Recognition Act 2004.
- 5
Why was the indefinite detention of foreign terrorist suspects held incompatible with the Convention?
Model answer
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] concerned indefinite detention of foreign terrorist suspects. The House of Lords held the scheme incompatible with Articles 5 and 14 because it discriminated by nationality.
- 6
How did Parliament respond to the Belmarsh detention ruling?
Model answer
Parliament repealed the detention power and replaced it with control orders under the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005. The episode is cited as evidence that a declaration can produce real legislative change.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UK, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.