Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Criminal Law: Offences Against the Person
Gross negligence manslaughter
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
Elements of gross negligence manslaughter and relationship generating a duty of care in this offence.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
State the elements of gross negligence manslaughter.
Which older case described the negligence required as showing disregard for life?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Which case sets out the modern test for gross negligence manslaughter?
Model answer
R v Adomako [1995] sets out the modern test for gross negligence manslaughter. An anaesthetist failed to notice a disconnected ventilator tube for several minutes.
- 2
State the elements of gross negligence manslaughter.
Model answer
The defendant must owe the victim a duty of care and must breach that duty. The breach must carry a serious and obvious risk of death, must cause the death, and must be so bad as to be criminal.
- 3
Which older case described the negligence required as showing disregard for life?
Model answer
R v Bateman (1925) described the negligence as going beyond compensation and showing disregard for the life of others. The direction was approved in R v Adomako [1995].
- 4
Who decides whether the negligence was gross?
Model answer
The jury decides whether the breach was so bad as to amount to a crime. The judge cannot direct the jury on where that line falls.
- 5
Must the risk be of death, or is a risk of serious injury enough?
Model answer
The breach must create a serious and obvious risk of death. A risk of serious injury alone is insufficient.
- 6
Which case confirmed that gross negligence manslaughter is sufficiently certain to satisfy human rights standards?
Model answer
R v Misra and Srivastava [2004] held that the offence is not so uncertain as to breach Article 7. Two doctors failed to treat a patient's post-operative infection.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Criminal Law: Offences Against the Person, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.