Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Tort: Occupiers' Liability
Child visitors and the principle of allurement
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
Section 2(3)(a) and the higher standard owed to the young, the allurement cases from Glasgow Corporation v Taylor to Jolley v Sutton, and how far Phipps v Rochester lets an occupier rely on a parent.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What is an allurement?
What did Glasgow Corporation v Taylor [1922] decide?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What does section 2(3)(a) of the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 say about children?
Model answer
Section 2(3)(a) requires an occupier to be prepared for children to be less careful than adults. Premises safe for an adult may not be safe for a child.
- 2
What is an allurement?
Model answer
An allurement is something on the premises that tempts a child into danger. An occupier who leaves an allurement must take extra care to guard it.
- 3
What did Glasgow Corporation v Taylor [1922] decide?
Model answer
A seven-year-old boy died after eating attractive poisonous berries growing in a public park. The House of Lords held the corporation liable, because the berries were an allurement to a child.
- 4
Why was the boat in Jolley v Sutton treated as an allurement?
Model answer
The abandoned boat invited children to play on it and to try to repair it. The council should have anticipated that children would meddle with the boat and be hurt.
- 5
What did Phipps v Rochester Corporation [1955] decide?
Model answer
A five-year-old fell into a trench on a building site while out with his seven-year-old sister. The court held the occupier not liable, because an occupier may expect a very young child to be supervised.
- 6
How far can an occupier rely on parental supervision?
Model answer
An occupier may assume that a prudent parent will not let a very young child roam alone in a dangerous place. The assumption is much weaker on premises designed for children.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Tort: Occupiers' Liability, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.