Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Criminal Law: General Elements of Liability
Recklessness, negligence and transferred malice
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
Recklessness in criminal law, negligence as a form of fault and offence that can be committed negligently.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Which case established the subjective test of recklessness?
What test of recklessness did MPC v Caldwell [1982] introduce?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Define recklessness in criminal law.
Model answer
Recklessness is the conscious taking of an unjustified risk. The defendant must be aware of the risk and go on to take it.
- 2
Which case established the subjective test of recklessness?
Model answer
R v Cunningham [1957] held that malice means intention or recklessness as to the harm in question. The defendant must actually foresee the risk of that harm.
- 3
What test of recklessness did MPC v Caldwell [1982] introduce?
Model answer
MPC v Caldwell [1982] introduced an objective test covering a defendant who failed to think about an obvious risk. Liability could follow even where the risk never crossed the defendant's mind.
- 4
Which case overruled the objective test of recklessness?
Model answer
R v G and another [2003] overruled MPC v Caldwell [1982] and restored the subjective test. Two boys aged 11 and 12 who set fire to newspapers had not appreciated the risk of spreading.
- 5
Why was the objective test of recklessness criticised?
Model answer
The objective test convicted defendants who genuinely never saw the risk, including children and those of low capacity. Conviction for a risk never perceived offends the fault principle.
- 6
State the two limbs of recklessness after R v G [2003].
Model answer
A defendant is reckless as to a result when aware of an unreasonable risk that it will occur. A defendant is reckless as to a circumstance when aware of a risk that it exists.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Criminal Law: General Elements of Liability, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.