Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Human Rights: Rules and Theory
Utilitarian and positivist objections to natural rights
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
Standard objection to leaving rights to utilitarian calculation, john Stuart Mill's harm principle and cultural relativist criticism of universal human rights.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Why did Bentham reject the idea of a right that exists before law?
What does legal positivism say about the validity of a law?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Which utilitarian philosopher dismissed natural rights as nonsense upon stilts?
Model answer
Jeremy Bentham dismissed imprescriptible natural rights as nonsense upon stilts. Bentham made the remark in Anarchical Fallacies, an attack on the French declaration of rights.
- 2
Why did Bentham reject the idea of a right that exists before law?
Model answer
Bentham held that a right is the product of a legal rule and nothing else. Talk of rights without a law behind them was, for Bentham, empty rhetoric.
- 3
What does legal positivism say about the validity of a law?
Model answer
Legal positivism says a rule is valid if it was made in the way the legal system requires. Moral merit is a separate question from legal validity on the positivist account.
- 4
How does utilitarianism assess a proposed restriction on a freedom?
Model answer
Utilitarianism weighs the restriction by its consequences for overall welfare. A limit on freedom is justified where it produces the greater balance of good.
- 5
State the standard objection to leaving rights to utilitarian calculation.
Model answer
Utilitarian calculation can justify sacrificing a minority where the majority gains more. A right is meant to resist exactly that kind of trade-off.
- 6
How did Ronald Dworkin answer the utilitarian argument?
Model answer
Ronald Dworkin described rights as trumps that individuals hold against collective goals. A government on that view may not override a right merely because the public benefit is larger.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Human Rights: Rules and Theory, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.