Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Tort: Defences and Remedies
Contributory negligence and the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
The old all-or-nothing rule, the apportionment section 1(1) introduced, and what a defendant has to prove — carelessness that contributed to the damage, not necessarily to the accident.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What does section 1(1) of the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 provide?
Is contributory negligence a complete defence today?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What was the position on contributory negligence before 1945?
Model answer
Contributory negligence was a complete defence at common law. A claimant even slightly at fault recovered nothing, as Butterfield v Forrester (1809) shows.
- 2
What does section 1(1) of the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 provide?
Model answer
Section 1(1) provides that damages are reduced to such extent as the court thinks just and equitable. The reduction reflects the claimant's share in the responsibility for the damage.
- 3
Is contributory negligence a complete defence today?
Model answer
Contributory negligence is a partial defence and reduces the damages only. The claim itself still succeeds.
- 4
What must a defendant prove to establish contributory negligence?
Model answer
The defendant must show that the claimant failed to take reasonable care for their own safety. The defendant must also show that the failure contributed to the damage suffered.
- 5
Must the claimant's carelessness contribute to the accident itself?
Model answer
The claimant's carelessness need only contribute to the damage rather than to the accident. A failure to wear a seat belt is the classic illustration.
- 6
What did Jones v Livox Quarries Ltd [1952] decide?
Model answer
A workman rode on the towbar of a vehicle against instructions and was crushed when another vehicle ran into it. The Court of Appeal reduced his damages, because he had exposed himself to a foreseeable risk.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Tort: Defences and Remedies, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.