Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Tort: Torts Connected to Land
Private nuisance: the parties and the interference
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
Who has the interest in land needed to sue after Hunter v Canary Wharf, who can be sued including an occupier who adopts a nuisance under Sedleigh-Denfield, and what counts as an interference.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Who may sue in private nuisance?
What did Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd [1997] decide about television reception?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Define private nuisance.
Model answer
Private nuisance is an unlawful indirect interference with a person's use or enjoyment of land. The interference must be unreasonable in all the circumstances.
- 2
Who may sue in private nuisance?
Model answer
Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd [1997] held that only a person with a proprietary interest in the land may sue. An owner or a tenant can sue, while a lodger or a child of the household cannot.
- 3
What did Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd [1997] decide about television reception?
Model answer
Residents complained that a large tower blocked their television signal. The House of Lords held that interference with television reception is not an actionable private nuisance.
- 4
Who can be sued in private nuisance?
Model answer
The creator of the nuisance can always be sued, whether or not still on the land. The occupier can be sued where the occupier created, adopted or continued the nuisance.
- 5
What did Sedleigh-Denfield v O'Callaghan [1940] decide?
Model answer
A trespasser laid a pipe with no grating in a ditch on the defendant's land, and flooding later damaged a neighbour. The House of Lords held the occupier liable for adopting and continuing the nuisance.
- 6
Can an occupier be liable for a naturally occurring hazard?
Model answer
Leakey v National Trust [1980] held an occupier liable for failing to prevent a natural landslip damaging neighbouring houses. The occupier owes a measured duty judged by resources and ability.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Tort: Torts Connected to Land, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.