levo

Tort: Negligence

Proving breach and res ipsa loquitur

  • 3 things to know
  • Components 2 and 3

Overview

The three conditions for letting the accident speak for itself, what the maxim actually does to the burden of proof, and the statutory shortcuts in section 11 of the Civil Evidence Act 1968.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

What does res ipsa loquitur mean?

Key term

State the three conditions for res ipsa loquitur.

Key term

What were the facts of Scott v London and St Katherine Docks Co (1865)?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What does res ipsa loquitur mean?

    Model answer

    Res ipsa loquitur means the thing speaks for itself. The maxim lets a court infer negligence from the way an accident happened.

  2. 2

    State the three conditions for res ipsa loquitur.

    Model answer

    The thing causing the damage must have been under the defendant's control. The accident must be one that does not ordinarily happen without negligence. There must also be no other explanation of how the accident occurred.

  3. 3

    What were the facts of Scott v London and St Katherine Docks Co (1865)?

    Model answer

    Six bags of sugar fell from a warehouse onto a customs officer passing below. The court held that such an accident does not happen without negligence, so an inference of negligence arose.

  4. 4

    What is the effect of res ipsa loquitur on a case?

    Model answer

    Res ipsa loquitur lets the court infer negligence where no other explanation appears. The defendant must then offer an explanation consistent with reasonable care.

  5. 5

    Does res ipsa loquitur reverse the burden of proof?

    Model answer

    The legal burden of proof stays on the claimant throughout the case. Res ipsa loquitur raises only an inference that the defendant has to answer with evidence.

  6. 6

    Give a modern situation in which res ipsa loquitur might apply.

    Model answer

    A surgical swab left inside a patient after an operation invites an inference of negligence. Nobody outside the operating team had control over the swab.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

See a huge jump in your memorisation

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The court sits in .
StrasbourgLondonParis

Blank Blitz consolidates the facts

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AAn interim injunction restrains publication before trial.
BPublication cannot be undone.
CAn injunction may be the only effective remedy.

Build It trains answer structure

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A Public Bill changes the general law.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Tort: Negligence, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.