Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Tort: Negligence
Proving breach and res ipsa loquitur
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
The three conditions for letting the accident speak for itself, what the maxim actually does to the burden of proof, and the statutory shortcuts in section 11 of the Civil Evidence Act 1968.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
State the three conditions for res ipsa loquitur.
What were the facts of Scott v London and St Katherine Docks Co (1865)?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What does res ipsa loquitur mean?
Model answer
Res ipsa loquitur means the thing speaks for itself. The maxim lets a court infer negligence from the way an accident happened.
- 2
State the three conditions for res ipsa loquitur.
Model answer
The thing causing the damage must have been under the defendant's control. The accident must be one that does not ordinarily happen without negligence. There must also be no other explanation of how the accident occurred.
- 3
What were the facts of Scott v London and St Katherine Docks Co (1865)?
Model answer
Six bags of sugar fell from a warehouse onto a customs officer passing below. The court held that such an accident does not happen without negligence, so an inference of negligence arose.
- 4
What is the effect of res ipsa loquitur on a case?
Model answer
Res ipsa loquitur lets the court infer negligence where no other explanation appears. The defendant must then offer an explanation consistent with reasonable care.
- 5
Does res ipsa loquitur reverse the burden of proof?
Model answer
The legal burden of proof stays on the claimant throughout the case. Res ipsa loquitur raises only an inference that the defendant has to answer with evidence.
- 6
Give a modern situation in which res ipsa loquitur might apply.
Model answer
A surgical swab left inside a patient after an operation invites an inference of negligence. Nobody outside the operating team had control over the swab.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Tort: Negligence, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.