Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Human Rights: Enforcement
- 8 subtopics
- 24 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
- Human Rights Law, one of four areas of which three are studied
What Human Rights: Enforcement covers
Human Rights: Enforcement is examined in Components 2 and 3, if human rights law is one of the three areas you sit. It covers the Human Rights Act and the domestic courts, interpretation and Strasbourg case law, declarations of incompatibility, public authorities and claims under the Act, judicial review: the grounds, judicial review: procedure, standing and remedies, the European Court of Human Rights and the effect and enforcement of Strasbourg judgments.
Where it is assessed
Components 2 and 3
Substantive Law in Practice and Perspectives of Substantive Law, if this is one of your three areas.
Check the Eduqas specification ↗The 8 subtopics
Each one has its own page.
- The Human Rights Act and the domestic courtsPosition before the Act, statement of compatibility and horizontal effect of the Act.Open →
- Interpretation and Strasbourg case lawMirror principle, judicial dialogue between London and Strasbourg and reading down.Open →
- Declarations of incompatibilityDeclaration of incompatibility, remedial order and significance of a declaration for the claimant in the case.Open →
- Public authorities and claims under the ActCore public authority, hybrid public authority and positive obligation.Open →
- Judicial review: the groundsJudicial review, illegality as a ground of review and fettering a discretion.Open →
- Judicial review: procedure, standing and remediesPermission stage, time limit for judicial review and test for standing.Open →
- The European Court of Human RightsEuropean Court of Human Rights, exhaustion of domestic remedies requirement and time limit for an application to the Court.Open →
- The effect and enforcement of Strasbourg judgmentsDifference between individual and general measures, judgment the United Kingdom did not implement quickly and relationship between the Strasbourg court and the Supreme Court.Open →
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Did the Human Rights Act incorporate the Convention wholesale?
What does section 2 of the Human Rights Act require of a court?
What does section 3 of the Human Rights Act require?
How strong is the interpretive obligation under section 3?
What is a declaration of incompatibility?
What happens after a declaration of incompatibility is made?
What is a core public authority?
Why has the definition of a public authority caused difficulty?
Who counts as a victim?
What is an improper delegation?
What is a legitimate expectation?
What is the pre-action protocol?
Name the three prerogative remedies.
What non-prerogative remedies are available?
Why are most applications declared inadmissible?
Are judgments of the European Court of Human Rights binding?
What is the European Court of Human Rights?
Which body supervises the execution of judgments?
Does the Human Rights Act apply to acts done before it came into force?
Which courts may make a declaration of incompatibility?
What is judicial review?
Which body is the European Court of Human Rights part of, and what is it not?
What must a state do to execute a judgment?
Take Human Rights: Enforcement further
The same content, four other ways.
Commonly confused
Pairs that lose marks when they are blurred together.
Illegality as a ground of judicial review vs Irrationality as a ground of judicial review
Illegality as a ground of judicial review: the power was misunderstood or exceeded. Irrationality as a ground of judicial review: it means no reasonable authority could have decided that way.
Questions from this topic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What did the Human Rights Act 1998 achieve?
Model answer
The Human Rights Act 1998 gave further effect in domestic law to most Convention rights. A person may now raise those rights in a United Kingdom court. Travelling to Strasbourg is no longer the only route.
- 2
Does the Human Rights Act apply to acts done before it came into force?
Model answer
The Act is not generally retrospective, so a public authority is not liable under section 6 for an act predating commencement. A narrow exception allows a victim to rely on Convention rights where proceedings were brought by a public authority.
- 3
What was the position before the Act?
Model answer
Before the Act a person alleging a breach had to take a case to Strasbourg after exhausting domestic remedies. The process took years and was expensive, which is why the Act was described as bringing rights home.
- 4
Which rights did the Act give effect to?
Model answer
The Act gives effect to most Convention rights and to certain Protocol rights, listed in Schedule 1. Article 13, the right to an effective remedy, was deliberately omitted, because the Act itself was said to supply the remedy.
- 5
Did the Human Rights Act incorporate the Convention wholesale?
Model answer
The Act did not incorporate the Convention as directly enforceable superior law. Parliament remains sovereign, and the Act works instead through interpretation, a duty on public authorities, and a declaration where a statute cannot be read compatibly.
- 6
Why is the Human Rights Act described as a compromise with parliamentary sovereignty?
Model answer
A court may not strike down an Act of Parliament for incompatibility with a Convention right. The court may only interpret the statute compatibly if possible, or declare it incompatible and leave the remedy to Parliament.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Human Rights: Enforcement revision questions
- What does Human Rights: Enforcement cover in Eduqas A-Level Law?
- 8 subtopics: the human rights act and the domestic courts, interpretation and strasbourg case law, declarations of incompatibility, public authorities and claims under the act, judicial review: the grounds, judicial review: procedure, standing and remedies, the european court of human rights and the effect and enforcement of strasbourg judgments. Each one has its own page with questions and model answers.
- How is Human Rights: Enforcement organised?
- By the Eduqas A150QS specification, subtopic by subtopic, so it matches the order you are taught it in.
Every question in Human Rights: Enforcement, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.