Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Criminal Law: General Elements of Liability
Intention: direct and oblique
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
Mens rea, direct intention and oblique intention.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What is mens rea?
Define direct intention.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is mens rea?
Model answer
Mens rea is the mental element or fault required by the definition of an offence. Intention, recklessness and negligence are the principal forms.
- 2
Define direct intention.
Model answer
Direct intention exists where the defendant's aim or purpose is to bring about the prohibited consequence. R v Mohan [1976] described intention as a decision to bring about the consequence.
- 3
What is oblique intention?
Model answer
Oblique intention arises where the defendant's purpose was something else but the prohibited consequence was a virtually certain side effect. A jury may then find intention even though the result was not the aim.
- 4
State the direction on oblique intention approved in R v Woollin [1999].
Model answer
R v Woollin [1999] held that a jury may find intention only where death or serious injury was a virtual certainty. The defendant must also have appreciated that virtual certainty.
- 5
Which earlier case produced the formulation adopted in R v Woollin [1999]?
Model answer
R v Nedrick [1986] framed the two questions of how probable the consequence was and whether the defendant foresaw it. R v Woollin [1999] adopted the substance of that direction.
- 6
Is foresight of virtual certainty the same as intention?
Model answer
R v Matthews and Alleyne [2003] confirmed that foresight of virtual certainty is evidence from which intention may be found. The rule is one of evidence rather than a definition of intention.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Criminal Law: General Elements of Liability, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.