Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
The Nature of Law
Law and society: fault and competing interests
- 3 things to know
- Component 1
Overview
The meaning and importance of fault in criminal and civil law, strict and no-fault liability, and how the law balances public against private interests, from Miller v Jackson to the Covid-19 restrictions.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Why is fault important in civil law?
What is meant by public interests and private interests in law?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What does fault mean in law?
Model answer
Blameworthiness: the defendant is legally responsible because of what they intended or foresaw, or because they fell below the standard of care the law expects.
- 2
Why is fault important in criminal law?
Model answer
Mens rea, such as intention or recklessness, usually has to be proved, and the level of fault decides the offence and sentence, as with murder and manslaughter, so only the culpable are punished.
- 3
How do strict liability offences depart from the fault principle?
Model answer
They need no mens rea for at least one element of the actus reus, as in Callow v Tillstone (1900), where a butcher who sold bad meat was convicted though a vet had passed it, and Harrow LBC v Shah (1999), on selling a lottery ticket to a child.
- 4
Why is fault important in civil law?
Model answer
In negligence the claimant must prove the defendant breached a duty of care by falling below the standard of the reasonable person, so compensation follows blame.
- 5
Give examples of civil liability without fault.
Model answer
Rylands v Fletcher liability for the escape of dangerous things, product liability under the Consumer Protection Act 1987, and vicarious liability, where an employer pays for an employee's tort without personal fault.
- 6
What are the arguments for and against a no-fault system of compensation?
Model answer
No-fault schemes, such as New Zealand's accident compensation scheme from 1974, compensate victims quickly without costly litigation, but they lose the deterrent and moral force of holding wrongdoers to account.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in The Nature of Law, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.