levo

The Nature of Law

Law and society: fault and competing interests

  • 3 things to know
  • Component 1

Overview

The meaning and importance of fault in criminal and civil law, strict and no-fault liability, and how the law balances public against private interests, from Miller v Jackson to the Covid-19 restrictions.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Process

Why is fault important in criminal law?

Process

Why is fault important in civil law?

Key term

What is meant by public interests and private interests in law?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    What does fault mean in law?

    Model answer

    Blameworthiness: the defendant is legally responsible because of what they intended or foresaw, or because they fell below the standard of care the law expects.

  2. 2

    Why is fault important in criminal law?

    Model answer

    Mens rea, such as intention or recklessness, usually has to be proved, and the level of fault decides the offence and sentence, as with murder and manslaughter, so only the culpable are punished.

  3. 3

    How do strict liability offences depart from the fault principle?

    Model answer

    They need no mens rea for at least one element of the actus reus, as in Callow v Tillstone (1900), where a butcher who sold bad meat was convicted though a vet had passed it, and Harrow LBC v Shah (1999), on selling a lottery ticket to a child.

  4. 4

    Why is fault important in civil law?

    Model answer

    In negligence the claimant must prove the defendant breached a duty of care by falling below the standard of the reasonable person, so compensation follows blame.

  5. 5

    Give examples of civil liability without fault.

    Model answer

    Rylands v Fletcher liability for the escape of dangerous things, product liability under the Consumer Protection Act 1987, and vicarious liability, where an employer pays for an employee's tort without personal fault.

  6. 6

    What are the arguments for and against a no-fault system of compensation?

    Model answer

    No-fault schemes, such as New Zealand's accident compensation scheme from 1974, compensate victims quickly without costly litigation, but they lose the deterrent and moral force of holding wrongdoers to account.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

See a huge jump in your memorisation

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The court sits in .
StrasbourgLondonParis

Blank Blitz consolidates the facts

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AAn interim injunction restrains publication before trial.
BPublication cannot be undone.
CAn injunction may be the only effective remedy.

Build It trains answer structure

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A Public Bill changes the general law.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in The Nature of Law, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.