Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary Offences
Duress of circumstances
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
The defence recognised in Willer and extended through Conway and Martin, with the two-limb test settled in R v Martin — a good cause to fear death or serious injury, and a sober person of reasonable firmness who would have acted the same way.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
What is duress of circumstances?
Which case first recognised duress of circumstances?
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
What is duress of circumstances?
Model answer
Duress of circumstances applies where the surrounding situation, rather than a person, compels the defendant to offend. The threat must again be of death or serious injury.
- 2
Which case first recognised duress of circumstances?
Model answer
R v Willer (1986) recognised the defence where a driver mounted a pavement to escape a threatening gang. The Court of Appeal treated the driving as done under duress of circumstances.
- 3
Which case extended the defence to reckless driving?
Model answer
R v Conway [1989] applied duress of circumstances to a charge of reckless driving. The defendant drove off believing his passenger was about to be attacked.
- 4
Which case settled the test for duress of circumstances?
Model answer
R v Martin (1989) applied the two-part Graham test to duress of circumstances. A husband drove while disqualified because his wife threatened suicide if he did not.
- 5
State the test for duress of circumstances.
Model answer
The defendant must have acted reasonably and proportionately to avoid a threat of death or serious injury. A sober person of reasonable firmness sharing the defendant's characteristics must have acted in the same way.
- 6
To which offences is duress of circumstances available?
Model answer
R v Pommell [1995] held that duress of circumstances is available to all offences except murder, attempted murder and some forms of treason. The defence is not confined to driving offences.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary Offences, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.