Eduqas A-Level Law A150QS
Parliamentary and European Law Making
Delegated Legislation
Statutory Interpretation
Judicial Precedent
The Civil Courts and Civil Process
The Criminal Process
Legal Personnel
Access to Justice and Funding
Contract: Rules and Theory of Contract LawContract
Contract: Essential Requirements and FormationContract
Contract: Express and Implied TermsContract
Contract: Misrepresentation and Economic DuressContract
Contract: Discharge of ContractContract
Contract: RemediesContract
Tort: Rules and Theory of Tort LawTort
Tort: NegligenceTort
Tort: Occupiers' LiabilityTort
Tort: Torts Connected to LandTort
Tort: Vicarious LiabilityTort
Tort: Defences and RemediesTort
Criminal Law: Rules and TheoryCriminal
Criminal Law: General Elements of LiabilityCriminal
Criminal Law: Offences Against the PersonCriminal
Criminal Law: Property OffencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Capacity DefencesCriminal
Criminal Law: Necessity Defences and Preliminary OffencesCriminal
Human Rights: Rules and TheoryHuman rights
Human Rights: Protection of Rights and Freedoms in the UKHuman rights
Human Rights: Convention ProvisionsHuman rights
Human Rights: Restrictions on Convention RightsHuman rights
Human Rights: EnforcementHuman rights
Human Rights: ReformHuman rights
Criminal Law: Property Offences
Theft: dishonesty
- 3 things to know
- Components 2 and 3
Overview
The three situations in section 2(1) that are not dishonest, the irrelevance of a willingness to pay, and the objective test the Supreme Court settled in Ivey v Genting Casinos in place of Ghosh.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
State the first situation in section 2(1) that is not dishonest.
State the second situation in section 2(1) that is not dishonest.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Is dishonesty defined in the Theft Act 1968?
Model answer
The Theft Act 1968 gives no positive definition of dishonesty. Section 2(1) instead lists three situations that are not dishonest.
- 2
State the first situation in section 2(1) that is not dishonest.
Model answer
A defendant is not dishonest who appropriates in the belief of a legal right to deprive the other of the property. The belief need not be reasonable, only genuine.
- 3
State the second situation in section 2(1) that is not dishonest.
Model answer
A defendant is not dishonest who believes the owner would consent if the owner knew of the appropriation and the circumstances. Borrowing from a friend who would not mind is the everyday example.
- 4
State the third situation in section 2(1) that is not dishonest.
Model answer
A defendant is not dishonest who believes the owner cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps. Finding money in the street may fall within this provision.
- 5
Does a willingness to pay prevent a finding of dishonesty?
Model answer
Section 2(2) provides that an appropriation may be dishonest even where the defendant is willing to pay. Taking goods and leaving the money behind can still be theft.
- 6
Which case set out the two-stage test of dishonesty applied until 2017?
Model answer
R v Ghosh [1982] asked first whether the conduct was dishonest by the standards of ordinary decent people. The second stage asked whether the defendant realised ordinary people would regard it as dishonest.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Criminal Law: Property Offences, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.