levo

Deductive Arguments for the Existence of God

Debating the ontological argument

  • 2 things to know
  • AS Unit 2

Overview

Recall questions on a priori reasoning, how the conception of God matters, why some traditions cannot use it, Gaunilo's and Kant's objections, and why it still holds interest.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Evaluation

Why is the ontological argument unavailable to some religious traditions?

Key term

How effective is Gaunilo's objection? Give the case that it fails.

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    Give the case that a priori arguments for God are persuasive.

    Model answer

    They aim at certainty rather than probability, they do not depend on contested empirical claims, and mathematics shows that reasoning from concepts alone can establish truths.

  2. 2

    Give the case that a priori arguments for God are not persuasive.

    Model answer

    Reasoning from concepts can establish what follows from a definition but not that anything answering to it exists, and no argument of this kind has convinced those who did not already believe.

  3. 3

    How does the conception of God affect whether the argument works?

    Model answer

    It requires the God of classical theism, perfect and necessary; a God conceived as limited, suffering or within time cannot be the greatest conceivable being.

  4. 4

    Why is the argument unavailable to some religious traditions?

    Model answer

    Traditions that refuse to define the divine, or that conceive ultimate reality as beyond being, cannot supply the definition the argument needs.

  5. 5

    Give the case that the ontological argument is effective.

    Model answer

    If sound it delivers a necessary God with certainty, and its central intuition — that a necessary being cannot be contingent — has survived a thousand years of criticism.

  6. 6

    Give the case that the ontological argument is ineffective.

    Model answer

    It appears to define God into existence, Kant's objection has never been decisively answered, and its conclusion outruns anything a definition could establish.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Christianity: Religious Figures and Sacred Texts
Christianity: Key Religious Concepts
Christianity: Religious Life and Moral Principles
Christianity: Practices and Religious Identity

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The Circle.
ViennaBerlinOxford

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe first blast destroys creation.
BThe second raises all the dead.
CHumanity is gathered before God.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A murti is the image itself.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Deductive Arguments for the Existence of God, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.