levo

Religious Language: Cognitive and Analogical

Debating meaning in religious language

  • 3 things to know
  • A2 Unit 5

Overview

Recall questions on whether the inherent problems are solved, confining talk of God to the believing context, meaningfulness, Logical Positivism as a criterion, non-cognitive responses, and the central choice.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

Give the case that the problems remain unsolved.

Key term

Should religious language be understood only within the context of belief? Give the case for.

Key term

Is religious language meaningful? Give the case that it is.

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    Have philosophers solved the inherent problems of religious language? Give the case that they have.

    Model answer

    Analogy, symbol and language games each show how meaningful speech about God is possible, and no serious philosopher now defends the verification principle.

  2. 2

    Give the case that the problems remain unsolved.

    Model answer

    Every solution either concedes that religious statements assert no facts or presupposes the knowledge of God it was meant to make possible.

  3. 3

    Should religious language be understood only within the context of belief? Give the case for.

    Model answer

    Words get their sense from the practices they belong to, so an outsider who does not share those practices misunderstands what is being said.

  4. 4

    Give the case against confining religious language to the believing context.

    Model answer

    It makes religious claims immune to outside criticism and unable to be argued for, which turns faith into a closed circle.

  5. 5

    Is religious language meaningful? Give the case that it is.

    Model answer

    Believers plainly communicate with one another, religious statements guide lives and provoke disagreement, and any criterion excluding them also excludes history and science.

  6. 6

    Is religious language meaningful? Give the case that it is not.

    Model answer

    Statements that no observation could bear on, and which are endlessly qualified when challenged, fail to say anything determinate about how things are.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Christianity: Religious Figures and Sacred Texts
Christianity: Key Religious Concepts
Christianity: Religious Life and Moral Principles
Christianity: Practices and Religious Identity

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The Circle.
ViennaBerlinOxford

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe first blast destroys creation.
BThe second raises all the dead.
CHumanity is gathered before God.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A murti is the image itself.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Religious Language: Cognitive and Analogical, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.