levo

Deontological Ethics: Finnis and Proportionalism

Evaluating Finnis' Natural Law and Proportionalism

  • 3 things to know
  • A2 Unit 4

Overview

Recall questions on acceptability in contemporary society, whether one theory promotes immoral behaviour, a basis for non-believers, the strengths and weaknesses of each, and which is the better ethic.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

Argue that Proportionalism promotes immoral behaviour.

Key term

Give the case that Finnis provides a basis for moral decisions for believers and non-believers alike.

Key term

Give the case that Finnis does not provide a basis for non-believers.

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    Argue that Finnis' Natural Law is acceptable in contemporary society.

    Model answer

    Its goods are recognisable across cultures, it needs no prior religious commitment, and its refusal to trade away a person's life resembles modern human rights thinking.

  2. 2

    Argue that Finnis' Natural Law is not acceptable in contemporary society.

    Model answer

    Listing religion among the basic goods looks partisan to secular critics, the goods cannot be ranked when they conflict, and his conclusions on sexual ethics are widely contested.

  3. 3

    Argue that Proportionalism promotes immoral behaviour.

    Model answer

    Once any rule may be broken for a proportionate reason, an agent can rationalise almost anything, and the protection that absolute prohibitions gave the vulnerable disappears.

  4. 4

    Argue that Proportionalism does not promote immoral behaviour.

    Model answer

    It keeps the rules as binding starting points, requires the reason to be genuinely proportionate and measured by love, and only permits the lesser evil where harm is unavoidable.

  5. 5

    Give the case that Finnis provides a basis for moral decisions for believers and non-believers alike.

    Model answer

    The basic goods are presented as self-evident to practical reason, so an atheist can accept the whole framework without accepting any theology.

  6. 6

    Give the case that Finnis does not provide a basis for non-believers.

    Model answer

    Religion is included among the goods and his conclusions align closely with Catholic teaching, so critics say the theology is doing work he does not admit.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Christianity: Religious Figures and Sacred Texts
Christianity: Key Religious Concepts
Christianity: Religious Life and Moral Principles
Christianity: Practices and Religious Identity

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The Circle.
ViennaBerlinOxford

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe first blast destroys creation.
BThe second raises all the dead.
CHumanity is gathered before God.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A murti is the image itself.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Deontological Ethics: Finnis and Proportionalism, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.