WJEC A-Level Religious Studies 603-0277-X
Christianity: Religious Figures and Sacred TextsChristianity
Christianity: Key Religious ConceptsChristianity
Christianity: Religious Life and Moral PrinciplesChristianity
Christianity: Practices and Religious IdentityChristianity
Islam: Religious Figures and Sacred TextsIslam
Islam: Key Religious ConceptsIslam
Islam: Religious Life and Moral PrinciplesIslam
Islam: Practices and Religious IdentityIslam
Judaism: Religious Figures and Sacred TextsJudaism
Judaism: Key Religious ConceptsJudaism
Judaism: Religious Life and Moral PrinciplesJudaism
Judaism: Practices and Religious IdentityJudaism
Buddhism: Religious Figures and Sacred TextsBuddhism
Buddhism: Key Religious ConceptsBuddhism
Buddhism: Religious Life and Moral PrinciplesBuddhism
Buddhism: Practices and Religious IdentityBuddhism
Hinduism: Religious Figures and Sacred TextsHinduism
Hinduism: Key Religious ConceptsHinduism
Hinduism: Religious Life and Moral PrinciplesHinduism
Hinduism: Practices and Religious IdentityHinduism
Sikhism: Religious Figures and Sacred TextsSikhism
Sikhism: Key Religious ConceptsSikhism
Sikhism: Religious Life and Moral PrinciplesSikhism
Sikhism: Practices and Religious IdentitySikhism
Ethical Thought: Divine Command, Virtue and Egoism
Aquinas and Natural Law
Fletcher and Situation Ethics
Utilitarianism
Inductive Arguments for the Existence of God
Deductive Arguments for the Existence of God
The Problem of Evil and Suffering
The Nature of Religious Experience
Christianity: Texts, Authority and Key Figures
Christianity: Historical Developments in Religious Thought
Christianity: Social Developments in Religious Thought
Christianity: Movements, Change and Contemporary Issues
Islam: Texts, Authority and Key Figures
Islam: Historical Developments in Religious Thought
Islam: Social Developments in Religious Thought
Islam: Movements, Change and Contemporary Issues
Judaism: Texts, Authority and Key Figures
Judaism: Historical Developments in Religious Thought
Judaism: Social Developments in Religious Thought
Judaism: Movements, Change and Contemporary Issues
Buddhism: Texts, Authority and Key Figures
Buddhism: Historical Developments in Religious Thought
Buddhism: Social Developments in Religious Thought
Buddhism: Movements, Change and Contemporary Issues
Hinduism: Texts, Authority and Key Figures
Hinduism: Historical Developments in Religious Thought
Hinduism: Social Developments in Religious Thought
Hinduism: Movements, Change and Contemporary Issues
Sikhism: Texts, Authority and Key Figures
Sikhism: Historical Developments in Religious Thought
Sikhism: Social Developments in Religious Thought
Sikhism: Movements, Change and Contemporary Issues
Meta-Ethics
Deontological Ethics: Finnis and Proportionalism
Determinism and Predestination
Free Will and Libertarianism
Psychological Challenges and Atheism
Religious Experience and Miracles
Religious Language: Cognitive and Analogical
Religious Language: Symbol, Myth and Language Games
New Testament: ParablesNew Testament
New Testament: MiraclesNew Testament
New Testament: The Letters (1 Peter)New Testament
Deontological Ethics: Finnis and Proportionalism
Evaluating Finnis' Natural Law and Proportionalism
- 3 things to know
- A2 Unit 4
Overview
Recall questions on acceptability in contemporary society, whether one theory promotes immoral behaviour, a basis for non-believers, the strengths and weaknesses of each, and which is the better ethic.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Give the case that Finnis provides a basis for moral decisions for believers and non-believers alike.
Give the case that Finnis does not provide a basis for non-believers.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Argue that Finnis' Natural Law is acceptable in contemporary society.
Model answer
Its goods are recognisable across cultures, it needs no prior religious commitment, and its refusal to trade away a person's life resembles modern human rights thinking.
- 2
Argue that Finnis' Natural Law is not acceptable in contemporary society.
Model answer
Listing religion among the basic goods looks partisan to secular critics, the goods cannot be ranked when they conflict, and his conclusions on sexual ethics are widely contested.
- 3
Argue that Proportionalism promotes immoral behaviour.
Model answer
Once any rule may be broken for a proportionate reason, an agent can rationalise almost anything, and the protection that absolute prohibitions gave the vulnerable disappears.
- 4
Argue that Proportionalism does not promote immoral behaviour.
Model answer
It keeps the rules as binding starting points, requires the reason to be genuinely proportionate and measured by love, and only permits the lesser evil where harm is unavoidable.
- 5
Give the case that Finnis provides a basis for moral decisions for believers and non-believers alike.
Model answer
The basic goods are presented as self-evident to practical reason, so an atheist can accept the whole framework without accepting any theology.
- 6
Give the case that Finnis does not provide a basis for non-believers.
Model answer
Religion is included among the goods and his conclusions align closely with Catholic teaching, so critics say the theology is doing work he does not admit.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in Deontological Ethics: Finnis and Proportionalism, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.