WJEC A-Level Religious Studies 603-0277-X
Christianity: Religious Figures and Sacred TextsChristianity
Christianity: Key Religious ConceptsChristianity
Christianity: Religious Life and Moral PrinciplesChristianity
Christianity: Practices and Religious IdentityChristianity
Islam: Religious Figures and Sacred TextsIslam
Islam: Key Religious ConceptsIslam
Islam: Religious Life and Moral PrinciplesIslam
Islam: Practices and Religious IdentityIslam
Judaism: Religious Figures and Sacred TextsJudaism
Judaism: Key Religious ConceptsJudaism
Judaism: Religious Life and Moral PrinciplesJudaism
Judaism: Practices and Religious IdentityJudaism
Buddhism: Religious Figures and Sacred TextsBuddhism
Buddhism: Key Religious ConceptsBuddhism
Buddhism: Religious Life and Moral PrinciplesBuddhism
Buddhism: Practices and Religious IdentityBuddhism
Hinduism: Religious Figures and Sacred TextsHinduism
Hinduism: Key Religious ConceptsHinduism
Hinduism: Religious Life and Moral PrinciplesHinduism
Hinduism: Practices and Religious IdentityHinduism
Sikhism: Religious Figures and Sacred TextsSikhism
Sikhism: Key Religious ConceptsSikhism
Sikhism: Religious Life and Moral PrinciplesSikhism
Sikhism: Practices and Religious IdentitySikhism
Ethical Thought: Divine Command, Virtue and Egoism
Aquinas and Natural Law
Fletcher and Situation Ethics
Utilitarianism
Inductive Arguments for the Existence of God
Deductive Arguments for the Existence of God
The Problem of Evil and Suffering
The Nature of Religious Experience
Christianity: Texts, Authority and Key Figures
Christianity: Historical Developments in Religious Thought
Christianity: Social Developments in Religious Thought
Christianity: Movements, Change and Contemporary Issues
Islam: Texts, Authority and Key Figures
Islam: Historical Developments in Religious Thought
Islam: Social Developments in Religious Thought
Islam: Movements, Change and Contemporary Issues
Judaism: Texts, Authority and Key Figures
Judaism: Historical Developments in Religious Thought
Judaism: Social Developments in Religious Thought
Judaism: Movements, Change and Contemporary Issues
Buddhism: Texts, Authority and Key Figures
Buddhism: Historical Developments in Religious Thought
Buddhism: Social Developments in Religious Thought
Buddhism: Movements, Change and Contemporary Issues
Hinduism: Texts, Authority and Key Figures
Hinduism: Historical Developments in Religious Thought
Hinduism: Social Developments in Religious Thought
Hinduism: Movements, Change and Contemporary Issues
Sikhism: Texts, Authority and Key Figures
Sikhism: Historical Developments in Religious Thought
Sikhism: Social Developments in Religious Thought
Sikhism: Movements, Change and Contemporary Issues
Meta-Ethics
Deontological Ethics: Finnis and Proportionalism
Determinism and Predestination
Free Will and Libertarianism
Psychological Challenges and Atheism
Religious Experience and Miracles
Religious Language: Cognitive and Analogical
Religious Language: Symbol, Myth and Language Games
New Testament: ParablesNew Testament
New Testament: MiraclesNew Testament
New Testament: The Letters (1 Peter)New Testament
The Problem of Evil and Suffering
Debating the problem of evil
- 3 things to know
- AS Unit 2
Overview
Recall questions on the classical and modern formulations, the relevance of Augustinian theodicy, the credibility of the Irenaean account, both as defences of theism, and their handling of natural evil.
What you need to know
Answer each one before you reveal it.
Give the case that modern arguments from evil do disprove God's existence.
Give the case that modern arguments from evil do not disprove God's existence.
Questions from this subtopic
Each one with the model answer underneath.
- 1
Give the case that the classical problem of evil is a serious problem for theism.
Model answer
It uses only claims the believer already accepts, and shows that holding all three together requires either qualifying God's power or goodness or explaining evil away.
- 2
Give the case that the classical problem is not as serious as it looks.
Model answer
It assumes a good God would always prevent suffering, which ignores that some goods are unobtainable without it, and Plantinga has shown the triad is not strictly inconsistent.
- 3
Give the case that modern arguments from evil do disprove God's existence.
Model answer
The evidential versions do not need logical inconsistency: the quantity of apparently pointless suffering makes a good omnipotent God improbable.
- 4
Give the case that modern arguments from evil do not disprove God's existence.
Model answer
Judging suffering pointless assumes we would recognise a justifying reason if there were one, which sceptical theism denies.
- 5
Give the case that Augustinian theodicy remains relevant.
Model answer
It takes moral responsibility seriously, its account of evil as privation avoids making God the author of evil, and its themes survive without a literal reading of Genesis.
- 6
Give the case that Augustinian theodicy is no longer relevant.
Model answer
It depends on a historical Fall and an inherited guilt that biology and biblical scholarship both reject, and its doctrine of hell offends the very goodness it defends.
Other ways to work this
The same content, four other ways.
What is inside Levo
Six ways to work the same material.
Every question in The Problem of Evil and Suffering, on a schedule.
Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.
Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.