levo

Deontological Ethics: Finnis and Proportionalism

Finnis and Proportionalism applied to immigration and capital punishment

  • 3 things to know
  • A2 Unit 4

Overview

Recall questions on the goods engaged by migration, the common good and limits, exclusion by race or religion, admitting refugees, deterrence, and extreme circumstances.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

Apply Finnis and Proportionalism to the death penalty.

Key term

Which basic goods are engaged by a question about immigration?

Key term

How can Finnis' idea of the common good support limits on immigration?

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    Which basic goods are engaged by a question about immigration?

    Model answer

    Life, friendship, knowledge, religion and practical reasonableness are all at stake, both for the person migrating and for the receiving community.

  2. 2

    How does the requirement that the goods apply equally to all bear on immigration?

    Model answer

    It rules out arbitrary preference between persons, so a migrant's claim on the basic goods counts as fully as a citizen's.

  3. 3

    How can Finnis' idea of the common good support limits on immigration?

    Model answer

    Authority exists to coordinate a community's pursuit of the goods, so a state may regulate arrivals where uncontrolled numbers would wreck that coordination.

  4. 4

    Why would exclusion by race or religion fail Finnis' test?

    Model answer

    It prefers some persons over others on an arbitrary ground, which the requirements of practical reasonableness expressly forbid.

  5. 5

    How would a Proportionalist frame the immigration question?

    Model answer

    By asking whether the ontic evils involved, such as pressure on housing or the separation of families, are outweighed by a proportionate reason.

  6. 6

    Give the Proportionalist argument for admitting refugees.

    Model answer

    The harm of refusal can be destitution or death, which so far outweighs the cost of admission that no proportionate reason justifies turning them away.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

See a huge jump in your memorisation

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Christianity: Religious Figures and Sacred Texts
Christianity: Key Religious Concepts
Christianity: Religious Life and Moral Principles
Christianity: Practices and Religious Identity

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The Circle.
ViennaBerlinOxford

Blank Blitz consolidates the facts

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe first blast destroys creation.
BThe second raises all the dead.
CHumanity is gathered before God.

Build It trains answer structure

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A murti is the image itself.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Deontological Ethics: Finnis and Proportionalism, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.