levo

Inductive Arguments for the Existence of God

Debating the inductive arguments

  • 3 things to know
  • AS Unit 2

Overview

Recall questions on the Kalam argument, teleological against cosmological strength, Hume's challenges, scientific against philosophical explanation, persuasiveness today, and the charge of proving too little.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Evaluation

Give one reason the Kalam argument is thought unconvincing.

Evaluation

Are the inductive arguments for God persuasive in the twenty-first century? Give the case for

Evaluation

Are the inductive arguments for God persuasive in the twenty-first century? Give the case against

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    Give the case that inductive arguments for God are persuasive.

    Model answer

    They begin from features of the world anyone can observe, they do not depend on accepting a definition of God in advance, and cumulatively they make theism a reasonable explanation.

  2. 2

    Give the case that inductive arguments for God are not persuasive.

    Model answer

    Their conclusions are only probable, they rely on assumptions about causation and analogy that Hume undermined, and naturalistic explanations now cover the same evidence.

  3. 3

    Give one reason the Kalam argument is thought convincing.

    Model answer

    Its premises are simple, widely accepted and supported by both philosophical argument against actual infinites and current cosmology.

  4. 4

    Give one reason the Kalam argument is thought unconvincing.

    Model answer

    Causation as we know it operates within time, so applying it to the beginning of time itself may be a category error.

  5. 5

    Why do some argue the teleological argument is stronger than the cosmological?

    Model answer

    It appeals to an intuition of purpose that people find immediately compelling, whereas the cosmological argument turns on contested metaphysics.

  6. 6

    Why do others argue the cosmological argument is stronger?

    Model answer

    It survives Darwin, because evolution explains biological order but not why anything exists at all.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Christianity: Religious Figures and Sacred Texts
Christianity: Key Religious Concepts
Christianity: Religious Life and Moral Principles
Christianity: Practices and Religious Identity

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The Circle.
ViennaBerlinOxford

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe first blast destroys creation.
BThe second raises all the dead.
CHumanity is gathered before God.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A murti is the image itself.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Inductive Arguments for the Existence of God, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.