levo

Religious Language: Symbol, Myth and Language Games

Debating the non-cognitive approaches

  • 3 things to know
  • A2 Unit 5

Overview

Recall questions on analogical and mythical solutions, the continuing relevance of the debate, language games, adequate meaning in symbol, the reply to Logical Positivism, and believers' resistance.

What you need to know

Answer each one before you reveal it.

Your recallNot started
Key term

Set out the case for and against the non-cognitive accounts of religious language.

Key term

How effective are non-cognitive, analogical and mythical accounts as solutions? Give the case that they work.

Key term

Give the case that non-cognitive, analogical and mythical accounts do not solve the problem of religious language

Questions from this subtopic

Each one with the model answer underneath.

  1. 1

    How effective are non-cognitive, analogical and mythical accounts as solutions? Give the case that they work.

    Model answer

    Between them they explain how religious language can carry meaning without meeting an empirical test, and each fits a real feature of religious practice.

  2. 2

    Give the case that they do not solve the problem.

    Model answer

    Each purchases meaning by giving up truth-claims, so they answer the positivist by conceding that religious statements assert nothing about reality.

  3. 3

    Are the problems of religious language still relevant? Give the case that they are.

    Model answer

    Public argument between believers and unbelievers constantly turns on whether religious claims mean anything determinate, and interfaith dialogue depends on it.

  4. 4

    Give the case that the debate has lost its urgency.

    Model answer

    Logical Positivism is dead, few now demand that all meaning be empirical, and the discussion has moved to whether religious claims are true rather than meaningful.

  5. 5

    Do language games resolve the problems? Give the case that they do.

    Model answer

    They locate meaning in use, which explains how believers understand each other perfectly well without any empirical test.

  6. 6

    Do language games resolve the problems? Give the case that they do not.

    Model answer

    They insulate religion from criticism, make interfaith and believer-unbeliever disagreement impossible, and leave the word God without reference.

Other ways to work this

The same content, four other ways.

What is inside Levo

Six ways to work the same material.

1Closed book
2Open book
3Closed book

The 3-step method, run for you

Answer cold, learn it, then prove it stuck. Levo tracks the jump between your first attempt and your last.

Christianity: Religious Figures and Sacred Texts
Christianity: Key Religious Concepts
Christianity: Religious Life and Moral Principles
Christianity: Practices and Religious Identity

Cram a whole paper in one sitting

Sort every topic into what you know and what you do not, then drill only the weak ones.

The Circle.
ViennaBerlinOxford

Blank Blitz makes facts automatic

Rapid timed gap-fills on the terms and numbers you need to recall without thinking.

AThe first blast destroys creation.
BThe second raises all the dead.
CHumanity is gathered before God.

Build It gets the exam shape right

Assemble a full-mark answer from its marking points, in the order an examiner wants them.

A murti is the image itself.
TrueFalse

Test It catches misconceptions

Spot the fault in a statement. The traps are the mistakes students actually make.

721941163128510

Brain Breaks between sessions

Short focus games to reset attention, so the next set lands better than the last.

Every question in Religious Language: Symbol, Myth and Language Games, on a schedule.

Attempt a question from memory, write the correct version, then attempt it again. Levo records the jump between your first attempt and your last, and brings each question back on the day you are due to forget it.

Or £46 a year, about £3.83 a month. Cancel anytime.